Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

On 15 January 2018 at 07:58, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 11. Januar 2018 05:38:29 MEZ schrieb Vaughan McAlley < > vaug...@mcalley.net.au>: > >On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" > >wrote: > > > >Hi Urs and All, > > > >A totally successful

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Am 11. Januar 2018 05:38:29 MEZ schrieb Vaughan McAlley : >On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" >wrote: > >Hi Urs and All, > >A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All >works fine as per the source

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Am 11.01.2018 07:40, schrieb Urs Liska: Am 11.01.2018 um 05:38 schrieb Vaughan McAlley: On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" wrote: Hi Urs and All, A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All works fine as per the source

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Am 11.01.2018 um 05:38 schrieb Vaughan McAlley: On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" > wrote: Hi Urs and All, A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All works fine as per the source

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

On 8 Jan 2018 12:35 p.m., "Andrew Bernard" wrote: Hi Urs and All, A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All works fine as per the source installations now updated. A large vote of thanks to all who untangled this ball of wool. Despite a

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Hi Urs and All, A totally successful install on a new Ubuntu 17.10 pristine image. All works fine as per the source installations now updated. A large vote of thanks to all who untangled this ball of wool. Despite a lifetime of software development experience, I kept going round in circles and

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

I've done a new iteration on the Wiki page. I've also added a concise walkthrough at the end that leaves out all the explanations and considerations, so it's easier to get an impression what has actually to be done. Best Urs Am 07.01.2018 um 09:18 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 07.01.2018 um

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Am 07.01.2018 um 07:43 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard: I planned to try the installation following the new description Satureday evening https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Installing-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux-(Package-or-Source) but had some drinks with friends in the evening ... I just read

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

I planned to try the installation following the new description Satureday evening https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Installing-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux-(Package-or-Source) but had some drinks with friends in the evening ... I just read the description and found: Note: As the desktop

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Am 7. Januar 2018 00:56:53 MEZ schrieb Simon Albrecht : >Hi Urs, >I did now test the instructions on an Ubuntu 16.04 Live system, and it >seems to work (Frescobaldi is up and running; I didn't test any of the >features). There's one typo: popller->poppler. My first

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Hi Urs, I did now test the instructions on an Ubuntu 16.04 Live system, and it seems to work (Frescobaldi is up and running; I didn't test any of the features). There's one typo: popller->poppler. My first question would be: what solution to using a .desktop file and still use the correct

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Hi Urs, thanks a lot, this sounds good. I'll try it when I'll have fixed my Ubuntu 16.04 Best, Simon Am 06-Jan-2018 11:40:55 +0100 schrieb li...@openlilylib.org: Hi all, after all the discussion about getting Frescobaldi to run on distributions based on Ubuntu < 17.xx I decided to

Re: New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

I have now finished a run-through of installation instructions. As I have once more renamed it the link is now https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Installing-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux-(Package-or-Source) I'd be glad about feedback: * confirmation * questions * reports about mistakes *

New information (success report) for Frescobaldi 3 and the Ubuntu 16.04 repositories

Hi all, after all the discussion about getting Frescobaldi to run on distributions based on Ubuntu < 17.xx I decided to give it a shot myself. TL;DR Frescobaldi *can* be installed on Ubuntu 16.04/Mint 18.3 from its own Git repositories and the Ubuntu package repositories without issues.