> Am 10.10.2020 um 17:49 schrieb Andrew Bernard :
>
> There's a term for it. Necroposting! Seriously!
I’m proud of my necromancer badge on stackexchange ;D
HR
There's a term for it. Necroposting! Seriously!
Andrew
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 02:24, David Kastrup wrote:
> Two weeks? I've replied on occasion to threads that were 10 years old,
> basically because threads tends to be archived and turn up on keyword
> searches.
Simon Albrecht writes:
>> On 10.10.20 14:11, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>>> Dear Karsten and list,
>>>
>>> On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if
not silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by
Lilypond
There’s no such thing as retracting an e-mail, but I would like to do it.
Sorry for failing to realise how old the thread was before replying.
Best, Simon
On 10.10.20 14:11, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Dear Karsten and list,
>
> On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
>> 5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if
>> not silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by
>> Lilypond are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the
Dear Karsten and list,
On 22.09.20 22:40, Karsten Reincke wrote:
5) I've learned, that all(?) of you consider this an untenable if not
silly position and that the PDFs and midi-files compiled by Lilypond
are never affected by the strong copyleft effect of the GPL. That's
good to hear. But I do
Dear ML members;
The thread becomes longer and longer. Hence I am going to summarize my
concerns and won't repeat myself never again:
1) In the beginning, there was the ask of Urs to be supported by
developing OLL because he wants to reduce his efforts. For making OLL a
little more welcoming
