Hi Urs,
> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
Of course, I don’t love it… but I don’t shy away from using it [via the
edition-engraver] when
Am 09.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>>> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
>>> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
>> Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best
On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Urs,
It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
It’s possible to wrap into a music function to deal with
"Urs Liska" wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:59 AM
> Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
>
> This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
> want the fourth note e' to move to the left because
Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
want the fourth note e' to move to the left because the intention is to
keep the regularity of the left hand intact.
Urs Liska wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:23 AM
> As discussed recently (starting here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-11/msg00054.html)
> LilyPond's optical spacing can have side-effects. If you consider the
> first attachment you can see that the quavers of the left
Am 04.12.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Urs Liska:
> How could I achieve what I need?
And for experimenting, here's the code
%
\version "2.19.32"
music = {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff {
c'16 e'
% place this override before the a' or the e' to experiment
As discussed recently (starting here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-11/msg00054.html)
LilyPond's optical spacing can have side-effects. If you consider the
first attachment you can see that the quavers of the left hand are
spaced irregularly because LilyPond moves the fourth
Am 04.12.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> "Urs Liska" wrote Friday, December 04, 2015 10:59 AM
>
>> Am 04.12.2015 um 11:54 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>> \once ] \override Arpeggio.minimum-X-extent =#'(-1 . 0)
>> This creates additional space by moving the Arpeggio to the right. But I
>>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Abraham Lee tisi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:39 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org boasts of
optical spacing for notes with alternating up and down stems, but it
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:09 AM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Abraham Lee tisi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:39 AM, James Harkins
jamshar...@gmail.com wrote:
Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org
Abraham Lee tisi...@gmail.com writes:
Equally spaced stems do look nice with groupings that change staff
constantly, however. I remember that SCORE had a feature that
enabled this. I've often thought that LilyPond should have this
option, but haven't studied the problem enough to know how
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:00 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Abraham Lee tisi...@gmail.com writes:
Equally spaced stems do look nice with groupings that change staff
constantly, however. I remember that SCORE had a feature that
enabled this. I've often thought that LilyPond should
At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the
stems are equidistant, but, at least to me, I feel like it's not
balanced and it makes the notehead spacing a little awkward... I'd
still rather see the default behavior. But we all
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com
wrote:
At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the stems
are equidistant, but, at least to me, I feel like it's not balanced and it
makes the notehead
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:18 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com
wrote:
At 16:07 11/07/2014 +0006, Abraham Lee wrote:
Maybe just me, but I don't really like the look of that. I see the stems
are
Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org boasts of
optical spacing for notes with alternating up and down stems, but it
seems this feature has been lost somewhere (or disabled by default). In
this example, it's quite plain to my eyes that the stems are not equally
spaced
Am 10.07.2014 11:39, schrieb James Harkins:
\version 2.18.2
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
Hm, there have been quite significant improvements in the horizontal
spacing engine recently. Can it be that this is a side-effect of this?
--
Am 10.07.2014 11:42, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 10.07.2014 11:39, schrieb James Harkins:
\version 2.18.2
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
Hm, there have been quite significant improvements in the horizontal
spacing engine recently. Can it be that this is a side-effect of this?
It
Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de writes:
Am 10.07.2014 11:42, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 10.07.2014 11:39, schrieb James Harkins:
\version 2.18.2
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
Hm, there have been quite significant improvements in the horizontal
spacing engine recently. Can it be that
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If I write
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
% \addlyrics { ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! }
Obviously, remove the % character for that experiment...
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Am 10.07.2014 14:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If I write
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
% \addlyrics { ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! }
Obviously, remove the % character for that experiment...
That is quite convincing.
So I guess the default spacing is
At 15:15 on 10 Jul 2014, Noeck wrote:
Am 10.07.2014 14:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If I write
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
% \addlyrics { ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! }
Obviously, remove the % character for that experiment...
That is quite convincing.
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 15:15 on 10 Jul 2014, Noeck wrote:
Am 10.07.2014 14:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If I write
\relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, }
% \addlyrics { ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! }
Obviously, remove the % character for that
Hi,
2014-07-10 15:15 GMT+02:00 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de:
So I guess the default spacing is now a bit thighter compared to
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing
Nope - the difference is because you're comparing different examples.
Example in Essay
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:39 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Something I've been wondering about for awhile... lilypond.org boasts
of optical spacing for notes with alternating up and down stems,
but it seems this feature has been lost somewhere (or disabled by
default). In this
26 matches
Mail list logo
