On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 16:41 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler writes:
> > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 04:17 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
> > > A duration without pitch is encoded as a NoteEvent with the
> > > pitchproperty. expand-repeat-notes! is the internal procedure
> > > thatcarries over
David Sumbler writes:
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 04:17 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
>> A duration without pitch is encoded as a NoteEvent with the pitch
>> property. expand-repeat-notes! is the internal procedure that
>> carries over the most recent pitch. So long as you insert these
>> events
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 04:17 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2021-04-30 3:39 am, David Sumbler wrote:
> > I want to be able to insert a note of the same pitch as the preceding
> > one. I don't mind what form the pitch information is in, so long as I
> > can use it to create a new note. It could,
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 12:15 on 30 Apr 2021, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Sumbler writes:
>>> How can I access the pitch value of this most recent note for use in a
>>> Scheme function after some rests?
>>
>> Other value-propating mechanisms exist for default durations (attached
>> by the
At 12:15 on 30 Apr 2021, David Kastrup wrote:
David Sumbler writes:
How can I access the pitch value of this most recent note for use in a
Scheme function after some rests?
Other value-propating mechanisms exist for default durations (attached
by the parser upon reading expressions),
On 2021-04-30 4:17 am, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2021-04-30 3:39 am, David Sumbler wrote:
I want to be able to insert a note of the same pitch as the preceding
one. I don't mind what form the pitch information is in, so long as I
can use it to create a new note. It could, for example, be in the
On 2021-04-30 3:39 am, David Sumbler wrote:
I want to be able to insert a note of the same pitch as the preceding
one. I don't mind what form the pitch information is in, so long as I
can use it to create a new note. It could, for example, be in the form
"b,,", or something similar to "(-2,
David Sumbler writes:
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Sumbler writes:
>> > In a \relative{ } passage, in order for Lilypond to work out
>> > theabsolute pitch of a note, it must have a record of the absolute
>> > pitchof the previous note, even if there have
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler writes:
> > In a \relative{ } passage, in order for Lilypond to work out
> > theabsolute pitch of a note, it must have a record of the absolute
> > pitchof the previous note, even if there have been some intervening
> >
David Sumbler writes:
> In a \relative{ } passage, in order for Lilypond to work out the
> absolute pitch of a note, it must have a record of the absolute pitch
> of the previous note, even if there have been some intervening rests.
> It seems probable that it has this information in all cases,
In a \relative{ } passage, in order for Lilypond to work out the
absolute pitch of a note, it must have a record of the absolute pitch
of the previous note, even if there have been some intervening rests.
It seems probable that it has this information in all cases, whether
relative pitch notation
11 matches
Mail list logo
