Evan Driscoll writes:
> Great, thanks! I tried something like that, but never had the space between
> the offset amount and following _, which in retrospect makes sense but I
> didn't think of at the time. I also agree in that context just the X-offset
> version looks better and now I'm using tha
I think \tweak instead of the overrides does get the position change result
you're after
http://lilybin.com/vhf35h/17
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 23:02, Evan Driscoll wrote:
>
>
> Great, thanks! I tried something like that, but never had the space between
> the offset amount and following _, whic
Great, thanks! I tried something like that, but never had the space between
the offset amount and following _, which in retrospect makes sense but I
didn't think of at the time. I also agree in that context just the X-offset
version looks better and now I'm using that in one of the two places it
ap
On 2022-04-12 12:25 pm, Evan Driscoll wrote:
http://lilybin.com/vhf35h/5 for example.
I have a note that has two text decorations on it, c^"pizz"_"marc", as
well
as a dynamic \f.
By default everything gets stacked (http://lilybin.com/vhf35h/6), but
that
gets really busy -- there's actually a
http://lilybin.com/vhf35h/5 for example.
I have a note that has two text decorations on it, c^"pizz"_"marc", as well
as a dynamic \f.
By default everything gets stacked (http://lilybin.com/vhf35h/6), but that
gets really busy -- there's actually a tempo marking and rehearsal mark at
that place as
