Re: Turns

2013-12-12 Thread David Kastrup
Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com writes: Shane Brandes, Please allow me to tap your expertise once again. In most cases the command you gave worked. Two identical ( as far as I can see ) codes are not producing identical engravings. My error? extra-offset tells

RE: Turns

2013-12-12 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Mr. Kastrup, Thank you for your input and providing another learning experience. Mark -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 6:57 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: 'Shane Brandes'; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Turns Mark

Re: Turns

2013-12-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Thursday, December 12, 2013 2:57 PM It does not really work well as a general mechanism. For rearranging stacking orders and similar automatically, the manual offers a number of recipes in

Re: Turns with Accidentals

2013-10-31 Thread Eluze
with 2.16... you can write ^\markup \tiny \flat ^\markup \musicglyph #scripts.turn ^\markup \tiny \flat and the order of these text scripts will be followed with 2.17... it should also be possible to \tweak the priorities directly (not tested) hth Eluze Am 31.10.2013 23:00, schrieb

RE: Turns with Accidentals

2013-10-31 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
, October 31, 2013 3:33 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Turns with Accidentals with 2.16... you can write ^\markup \tiny \flat ^\markup \musicglyph #scripts.turn ^\markup \tiny \flat and the order of these text scripts will be followed with 2.17... it should also be possible to \tweak

Re: Turns with Accidentals

2013-10-31 Thread Eluze
. Mark From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eluze Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:33 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Turns with Accidentals with 2.16... you can write ^\markup