On 10/29/2012 04:52 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
I had to take a break from LilyPond development for a couple months
but I hope to be back on board in a month or so. This was the exact
problem that I was working on. The long and short of it is that
LilyPond does not know how to handle
Try using two Dynamics contexts, one above and one below.
DR
-Original Message-
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:14 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics positioning
Hi,
Could someone please take a look at the attached file and
, 2012 9:45 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: dynamics positioning
Thanks.
My logic suggests it should be enough to add this line above the cymbals part,
but it doesn't seems to work (see attached file).
\new Dynamics {
\time 3/8
\times 2/3 { s8\mf s32 s32 s8.\pp \times 8/13 { s64
out: http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
DR
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:45 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: dynamics positioning
Thanks.
My logic suggests it should be enough to add this line above the cymbals
...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: dynamics positioning
Sorry for the oversight. The attached code is as minimal as I can get it.
Thanks,
Peter
On 10/29/2012 02:48 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Can't really tell from the attachment. As a rule
Daniel Rosen wrote
Unfortunately, while this corrects the horizontal alignment of the grobs
within the Dynamics context, they now collide with the beams, so the
vertical spacing needs to be adjusted. I'm not sure how to do that without
having to adjust 'Y-offset for each individual
on the list.
DR
-Original Message-
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: dynamics positioning
Sorry for the oversight. The attached code is as minimal as I can get it.
Thanks
The conclusion is that you should look at the manual for version 2.6 if
you use that version and the manual for version 2.7 if you use that.
The original answer provided a link to the version 2.7 manual.
/Mats
Thomas Ruedas wrote:
On Monday 05 December 2005 19:22, David Rogers wrote:
On
Hi again,
On Monday 05 December 2005 06:02, David Rogers wrote:
On 4-Dec-05, at 6:42 PM, Thomas Ruedas wrote:
lately I have been wondering about how to position dynamics
commands (i.e. f, p, mf, etc.) so that they are exactly in the
middle between the two staves of a piano score.
On Monday 05 December 2005 19:22, David Rogers wrote:
On 5-Dec-05, at 8:52 AM, Thomas Ruedas wrote:
I use 2.6.3 and got the following error:
Interpreting music...
error: unknown translator: `Engraver_group'
In the link above, I've changed 2.7 to 2.6 - there appear to be
some small
Hi,
lately I have been wondering about how to position dynamics commands
(i.e. f, p, mf, etc.) so that they are exactly in the middle between
the two staves of a piano score. The way suggested in the docs is to
put them into the notes of either the right or left hand, but this
results in them
On 4-Dec-05, at 6:42 PM, Thomas Ruedas wrote:
Hi,
lately I have been wondering about how to position dynamics commands
(i.e. f, p, mf, etc.) so that they are exactly in the middle between
the two staves of a piano score. The way suggested in the docs is to
put them into the notes of either the
12 matches
Mail list logo
