Lj,
-Original Message-
From: l...@internet.com.uy l...@internet.com.uy
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra
I don't know how the code works, but as someone who browses the LSR
I would just say that there is only one tweak needed, but you are
implying there are cases when you need more than one tweak.
i'm not implying, i'm saying it quite explicitly. and i sent a
complete example demonstrating
Hello
-Original Message-
From: l...@internet.com.uy l...@internet.com.uy
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:57:02 -0200
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: horizontal beams
I don't know how the code works, but as someone who browses the LSR
I would just say
Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra tweaks *should* work in all cases or not. If it
should then we have a bug and it should be reported as such.
yes, i think that the tweak definitely should work without further
tweaks. it looks
Hello
-Original Message-
From: l...@internet.com.uy l...@internet.com.uy
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra
James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com escribió:
So if you know that it does not guarantee horizontal beams then the
snippet is wrong and it needs to be corrected, I can only go on what
I am told in the documentation or the snippet repository. So there
is no point adding another snippet to
LLj
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
Behalf Of l...@internet.com.uy
Sent: 21 January 2011 12:11
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: horizontal beams
James Lowe
James, i must say i'm confused by most of your mail...
We don't add \overrides (i.e tweaks) to the manual directly.
???
the line \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 is in the manual in an
example how to make beams horizontal. the manual is actually full of
snippets with \overrides, so
Lj
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
l...@internet.com.uy
Sent: 20 January 2011 10:18
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
James, i must say i'm
On Wed 19 Jan 2011, 11:08 l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
i'm using \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 to get horizontal beams
(the only hack i know and that i could find to get horizontal
beams). but more or less randomly some groups of notes are rendered
with some slant. i haven been able to
Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com escribió:
\override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
\override Beam #'details #'damping-direction-penalty = #0
I've added these two, and it seemed to work.
thank you, dmytro. yes, it seems to work (except for kneed beams, but
i
Lj
-Original Message-
From: l...@internet.com.uy
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:44:50 -0200
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com escribió:
\override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
\override
12 matches
Mail list logo
