2009/8/4 Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com:
I can imagine how this would be implemented, but it would be a lot of
work. If anyone is up for a challenge, I can give some pointers. :)
OK, now there's no way I'm gonna let you get away with such a promise :-)
Jay Anderson wrote:
global =
{
\time 4/4 s4*4*10
\time 3/4 s4*3*5
\time 7/4 s4*7
\time 4/4 \anchor #'coda s4*4*10
\bar |.
}
\addAt #'coda \global {\tempo \markup Extremely slow}
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Werner
___
lilypond-user
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Why not?
- Mark
IIUC, one interesting advantage of this is that scheme symbols
have less restrictions than parser identifiers:
\anchor #'m.32
\anchor #'flute2-entrance
Mhmm, this is not something we should advertize loudly...
Why not?
I believe it confuses users that Scheme code allows more symbols
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Would it be technically feasible/possible to establish a system of
anchors instead?
This would be indeed a great feature!
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
Seriously, I seem to recall that I proposed this feature some 11-12
years ago and at that
Hi Mats,
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
An *extremely* underrated and powerful command. ;-p
One alternative way to achieve the same thing is to simply do a
global =
{
\time 4/4 s4*4*10
\time 3/4 s4*3*5
\time 7/4 s4*7
{ \time 4/4
\bar |. }
\anchoredStuff
}
Nope: that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Mats Bengtssonmats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote:
Reminds me of the GOTO command in BASIC! ;-)
Seriously, I seem to recall that I proposed this feature some 11-12 years
ago and at that Han-Wen at that time answered with a No!!! (I don't
remember any details and
Would it be technically feasible/possible to establish a system of
anchors instead?
This would be indeed a great feature!
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Like many Lilyponders, I break down my code into variables, e.g.
global (for time signature changes, etc.), notes, dynamics, etc.
The main irritation with this (IMO) is that each variable
requires a complete set of skips in order to keep the timing
accurate.
Would
Hi Mark,
Have you tried using the \tag command?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Different-
editions-from-one-source#Using-tags
Certainly I've used \tag for filtering content, but I don't
understand how \tag could help with the problem I'm describing...
could you
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Kieren
MacMillankieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
Like many Lilyponders, I break down my code into variables, e.g. global (for
time signature changes, etc.), notes, dynamics, etc. The main irritation
with this (IMO) is that each variable requires
12 matches
Mail list logo
