Hello Jean,
I expected something like this might be possible, thank you for this simple
solution! I surely could not have done this this elegantly!
Maybe I’ll try to extend this to allow for specifying paths.
Maybe also it could work to set custom toplevel handlers to have scores and
> You won't get far without parsing the file.
I was rather talking about the relevant functionality essentially being done
after parsing the included file.
> Feel free to create an implementation. That will apparently be easier
> than to prove viability to me.
First I’ll have to do some
David Wright writes:
> On Tue 01 Feb 2022 at 16:09:01 (+0100), Leo Correia de Verdier wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to have an \include inside a function?
>> In the attached file includeinfunction.ly the commented out line
>> doesn’t work (probably for some very logical reason, but still
>>
Valentin Petzel writes:
>> And it still breaks down because at the top level, LilyPond input does
>> not reflect a static structure but directs actions, actions that have
>> immediate consequences _while_ still reading ahead.
>
> I do not understand why this matters here? Doesn’t this only
Le 01/02/2022 à 23:14, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Well, if you are ready to get evil, you can do
\version "2.23.5"
includeNamespace =
#(define-scheme-function (filename) (string?)
(let ((new-parser (ly:parser-clone)))
(ly:parser-parse-string
new-parser
(format #f "\\include
> Since you removed every single bit of context, it's not even possible to
> say anymore what you want to be talking about.
But I’ve been saying this since the beginning. The idea would be to have a way
to parse a ly file (or a string) within a different scope, and then make the
scope
Le 01/02/2022 à 20:10, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
Hello David,
An assignment basically adds a pair (symbol, value) to some assignment table.
So shouldn’t it be possible to parse a file with a new assignment table and
then convert this assignment table into a scheme accessible structure?
I do
> That's just wild handwaving. Something like
>
> bing = cis'
> bing = { $bing 2-2 }
> \score {
> \bing
> }
>
> does not resolve in such a manner since the _structure_ of the
> expression containing $bing cannot be resolved without knowing the type
> of bing at the time $bing is encountered.
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello David,
>
> An assignment basically adds a pair (symbol, value) to some assignment table.
> So shouldn’t it be possible to parse a file with a new assignment table and
> then convert this assignment table into a scheme accessible structure?
That's just wild
> And it still breaks down because at the top level, LilyPond input does
> not reflect a static structure but directs actions, actions that have
> immediate consequences _while_ still reading ahead.
I do not understand why this matters here? Doesn’t this only matter while we
are parsing the
Valentin Petzel writes:
>> Since you removed every single bit of context, it's not even possible to
>> say anymore what you want to be talking about.
>
> But I’ve been saying this since the beginning. The idea would be to have a
> way
> to parse a ly file (or a string) within a different
Valentin Petzel writes:
>> That's just wild handwaving. Something like
>>
>> bing = cis'
>> bing = { $bing 2-2 }
>> \score {
>> \bing
>> }
>>
>> does not resolve in such a manner since the _structure_ of the
>> expression containing $bing cannot be resolved without knowing the type
>> of
Hello Leo,
Here are two ways to do it, one by using \include and one directly parsing the
contents of the file.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2022, 16:09:01 CET schrieb Leo Correia de Verdier:
> Dear list!
>
> Is there a way to have an \include inside a function?
> In the attached
Hello David,
An assignment basically adds a pair (symbol, value) to some assignment table.
So shouldn’t it be possible to parse a file with a new assignment table and
then convert this assignment table into a scheme accessible structure?
I do not mean to say that assignments should not be
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hi David!
>
> I suppose it might be useful to have something like a parsing function
> that does parse a file internally, but returns a scheme structure
> containing all variables, functions, scores, books, whatever defined
> in that file. This would make using stuff in
Hi David!
I suppose it might be useful to have something like a parsing function that
does parse a file internally, but returns a scheme structure containing all
variables, functions, scores, books, whatever defined in that file. This would
make using stuff in a different file much more clean
On Tue 01 Feb 2022 at 16:09:01 (+0100), Leo Correia de Verdier wrote:
>
> Is there a way to have an \include inside a function?
> In the attached file includeinfunction.ly the commented out line doesn’t work
> (probably for some very logical reason, but still unknown to me). Is there a
> way to
Leo Correia de Verdier writes:
> Dear list!
>
> Is there a way to have an \include inside a function?
> In the attached file includeinfunction.ly the commented out line
> doesn’t work (probably for some very logical reason, but still unknown
> to me).
Uh, if you write the content of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
