Re: Acciaccatura question/issue

2022-07-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
As a further aside, because these are graces, there's nothing wrong with having them as 16s but they are not really tuplets three in the space of 2 because the whole point is they occupy no notation time. They'd be clearer just as 3 16s. People like Chopin have long grace runs with maybe 17

Re: Acciaccatura question/issue

2022-07-15 Thread Andrew Bernard
Turning this into compilable code with a couple of braces, directly copied from you post, works just fine for me with lilypond 2.23.10. Given they are tuplets technically they are really graces not appogiaturas, but that has no bearing on your issue. And yes it is correct that notation wise

Re: Acciaccatura question/issue

2022-07-15 Thread jh
Unfortunately I don't think I can. I can post/send the entire thing which will drive everyone hatefully crazy that's why I just took the part that didn't do what I expected. The first measure is correct with 4 quarters in the bar the second one doesn't only 3 with the acciaccatura. I use a

Re: Acciaccatura question/issue

2022-07-15 Thread Knute Snortum
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:34 PM jh wrote: > > using 2.22.2 in fresco, my very old understanding of grace and > acciaccatura is that they receive no duration value in a measure. That's correct. > the > following Minimal example using forget for accidentals when compiled > allows only 3 quarter