Re: Arbitrary number of arguments in Scheme function?

2016-02-17 Thread Urs Liska
Am 17.02.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Peter Crighton: > 2016-02-17 14:02 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : >> That requires a change in the parser. If you put up a respective >> request, I'll take a look whether I can implement it in one of the next >> versions. > How and where do I do that?

Re: Arbitrary number of arguments in Scheme function?

2016-02-17 Thread Peter Crighton
2016-02-17 14:02 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > That requires a change in the parser. If you put up a respective > request, I'll take a look whether I can implement it in one of the next > versions. How and where do I do that? -- Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in

Re: Arbitrary number of arguments in Scheme function?

2016-02-17 Thread David Kastrup
Simon Albrecht writes: > On 17.02.2016 14:02, David Kastrup wrote: >> I don't really see much of an option other than accepting 8 and >> consequently also 8(~ as an expression of type ly:music? > > Which would be a useful feature IMO. Me and my worm can collection. --

Re: Arbitrary number of arguments in Scheme function?

2016-02-17 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 17.02.2016 14:02, David Kastrup wrote: I don't really see much of an option other than accepting 8 and consequently also 8(~ as an expression of type ly:music? Which would be a useful feature IMO. Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Arbitrary number of arguments in Scheme function?

2016-02-17 Thread David Kastrup
Peter Crighton writes: > Hello, > > I am working on a Scheme function that improves ties when writing in > rhythmic notation (improvisationOn). Now I have the problem that I > don’t know how many post events a duration might have – my current > function works only for one