Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: I've been asked a beaming rule question: Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided into a triplet? In this example \version 2.16.0 \score { {\time 3/8 d''4 \times 2/3 { bes''16 a'' bes'' }

RE: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Richard, This may help: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/beams#setting-autom atic-beam-behavior Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Richard Shann

Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Shann
Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want visually and letting the computer do the hard work... Your new 2.19 syntax certainly looks

Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Shann
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:52 +, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 4:30 PM Subject: Different beaming for triplets I've been asked a beaming rule

Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. Yes. It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want visually and letting the computer

Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Shann
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. Yes. It would be nice to have a graphical

Re: Different beaming for triplets

2013-12-04 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge.