Hi Noeck
Sorry for a late answer. I have been away from home and not being able
to read my e-mail.
On 2015-05-23 20:41, Noeck wrote:
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', or { } is not needed. You can even
write a single note
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', or { } is not needed. You can even
write a single note without brackets:
\new Staff a
but of course not two:
\new Staff a b
At the top level you need something to tell LilyPond that this is
On 2015-05-22 22:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/22/15 10:03 AM, 70147pers...@telia.com 70147pers...@telia.com
wrote:
Hi Carl!
Yes, you are the person with the big understanding. I learned t from
your solution, that you can, and in this case must, do things inside
On 5/22/15 10:03 AM, 70147pers...@telia.com 70147pers...@telia.com
wrote:
Hi Carl!
Yes, you are the person with the big understanding. I learned t from
your solution, that you can, and in this case must, do things inside
open parenthesis.
I am concerned that you do
On 2015-05-22 02:18, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/21/15 5:23 PM, Kaj Persson kape_...@algonet.se wrote:
The example shows, that LilyPond perfectly understands the implied
structure and it also understands which lyric belongs to which note.
So that is not the problem. A minor issue is
Kaj,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Kaj [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n176837...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
I am working on a piece of choir music. It consists of two parts, the
first of which is written on one staff, and the second two staves. The
upper staff in part two is a continuation of
,
Abraham
View this message in context: Re: Putting lyrics below its staff?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Putting-lyrics-below-its-staff-tp176837p176853.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive
http://lilypond
