Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
It really depends on the music and kind of guitar.
Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in
fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques.
I know very few pieces for electric guitar which use alternate tunings
(usually 6th
2013/12/7 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
It really depends on the music and kind of guitar.
Alternate tunings are used mostly on acoustic guitar and especially in
fingerstyle and flatpicking tecniques.
I know very few pieces for electric guitar
2013/12/8 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
2013/12/5 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
Hi Federico,
How should this ever work?
Thinking of
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2013/12/8 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
2013/12/5 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
Hi
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
What I meant was: what is required for the a minimal first useful
user experience. Would a hardcoded tuning do, so that we can
implement a tuning choosing mechanism later?
yes, stringTunings = #guitar-tuning would be ok for most guitarists
It
2013/12/5 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
When you enter the fret number, the program can find the right pitch
combining string + fret number (and taking the tuning into account).
Hi Federico,
How should this ever work?
Thinking of modulations/enhormonics.
-Harm
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Federico Bruni writes:
Sure, but the thing is: why showing the text input if you cannot
modify it?
Why enable editing the text input as long as it's next to useless
because it's slow and buggy? Your request is noted, though.
Next to useless is
David Kastrup writes:
Why enable editing the text input as long as it's next to useless
because it's slow and buggy? Your request is noted, though.
Next to useless is O(1) of useful. Bugs get fewer and machines
faster. Word for Windows became a success story ultimately.
What I mean is
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Can we do away with choosing the tuning, isn't there a common tuning
for guitar that 90% of guitars use?
Can we do away with the command line, isn't there a common desktop
environment that 90% of computer users use?
What I meant was: what is
Federico Bruni writes:
I'm not a coder, so nothing.
I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my
computer.
Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development
is so slow the code is only available to the actual developers for now.
I see that the
Noeck writes:
how do you generate the visual output?
Using LilyPond.
Does this scale to larger scores?
It depends. Larger score support will need a lot of work. The first
thing is to get this project really started.
Is there a possibility to compile line by line to get smaller changes
2013/12/5 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
Federico Bruni writes:
I'm not a coder, so nothing.
I was just thinking that I may test it better if I could run it on my
computer.
Okay...thanks for the offer! I'll think about it. Because development
is so slow the code is only available
Mark Knoop writes:
There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are
inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the
selected clef.
Thanks!
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
Federico Bruni writes:
It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3
years
ago.
Yes.
So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
source code anywhere.
Unfortunately we can test the demo
Federico Bruni writes:
So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
source code anywhere.
Unfortunately we can test the demo only
Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently.
What would you do with the code?
I did a quick test. Funny, I
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I felt like working on a reversed Frescobaldi:
input in the GUI, output text. :-)
So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans:
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I felt like working on a reversed Frescobaldi:
input in the GUI, output text. :-)
So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/284
If any part
Am 03.12.2013 17:46, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 03.12.2013 17:20, schrieb Johan Vromans:
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I felt like working on a reversed Frescobaldi:
input in the GUI, output text. :-)
So what the world needs is a bidirectional Frescobaldi.
+1
See
… and another question: Can the Schikkers List code be found somewhere?
As there are quite some ideas coming up on the page linked below, it
would probably be interesting how Schikkers List solved some issues.
Cheers,
Joram
See https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/284
2013/12/3 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org
Federico Bruni writes:
So no download on the website (it's not working, as already reported), no
source code anywhere.
Unfortunately we can test the demo only
Why is that unfortunate? The demo is really all there is, currently.
What would
Noeck writes:
http://lilypond.org/schikkers
This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the html5 demo new,
compared to last year? The last time I looked, it didn't work for me)
Thanks. I found some time this spring and it improved a lot. I haven't
had any time to work on it
2013/12/3 Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
This is *exactly* why I've been playing/experimenting with GUI
backends/frontends since 2004. If you haven't done so, please have
a look at Schikkers List
http://lilypond.org/schikkers
This looks really cool! (Has it improved a lot or is the
Federico Bruni writes:
It was hosted on github years ago, but now I see that last update is 3 years
ago.
Yes.
The demo is not working on Chromium 31.0.1650.57
It was down. Please try again?
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT
There seems to be a bug - see attached screenshot. Key signatures are
inserted always as if in treble clef rather than appropriate to the
selected clef.
--
Mark Knoop
attachment: bug.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Paul Morris writes:
Nice progress on Schikkers list! It seems like it is coming along
well.
Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving
feedback, like you :-)
One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of
this), is that selecting a different note
On Aug 20, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Thank you! Now all I need is more hackers and users/people giving
feedback, like you :-)
Glad to help. :-)
One thing that is counter-intuitive (maybe you're already aware of
this), is that selecting a different note
26 matches
Mail list logo
