[lots of discussion about LilyPond vs other notation software]
Hi people,
it seems that i've missed an important discussion. After reading it
(and reading comments on the Steinberg blog), i decided to add my
comment in the form of a blog post:
Hello Janek,
Very interesting post, thanks!
Typo: algorythmic
JM
Le 14 août 2013 à 10:54:17, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com a écrit :
[lots of discussion about LilyPond vs other notation software]
Hi people,
it seems that i've missed an important discussion. After reading it
An absolutely marvellous typo in our particular context. :-)
Andrew
Jacques Menu
14 August 2013
7:25 PM
Typo:algorythmic
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Lol, indeed!
Thanks for letting me know, Jacques! Corrected.
Janek
2013/8/14 Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com
An absolutely marvellous typo in our particular context. :-)
Andrew
Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch
14 August 2013 7:25 PM
Typo: algorythmic
Am 08.08.2013 14:09, schrieb David Kastrup:
Well, if enough people only slightly overstep a line, it will disappear.
I think it would make sense to expand on most followup thoughts in our
own blog, once they can't be expected to be of much interest to Daniel.
While he will be able to answer
Am 08.08.2013 04:29, schrieb SoundsFromSound:
Thoughts?
http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/08/development-diary-part-two/?fb_source=pubv1
For now just one:
Let's see if Kieren's comments on the post provoke _any_ response.
Anybody ready to write a post on lilypondblog.org about polymetrics,
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
Period.
With LilyPond, you're only limited by your
Am 08.08.2013 10:35, schrieb SoundsFromSound:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
Period.
With
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The blog did inspire me a little bit, we could add two new glyphs
to the feta font that have
Am 08.08.2013 11:06, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The blog did inspire me a little bit, we
Urs Liska writes:
And I think that adding text input as an option (if it is thoroughly
thought through) would be a great step forward for the resulting
program.
Aren't they talking about keyboard entry, instead of text input?
Text input is about the storage format. Most wordprocessors have
Am 08.08.2013 11:11, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
Urs Liska writes:
And I think that adding text input as an option (if it is thoroughly
thought through) would be a great step forward for the resulting
program.
Aren't they talking about keyboard entry, instead of text input?
Text input is
Am 08.08.2013 11:08, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 08.08.2013 11:06, schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of
the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
The
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing a
Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all its
related tools for my everyday work.
So for me using lilypond is a quite natural thing and I am getting
better and quicker using
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
Maybe because some people don't comment on
Am 08.08.2013 12:47, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
SoundsFromSound writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Yes, it could be very interesting to know why comments about Lilypond
are ignored.
Maybe
SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I were Daniel, I'd be pissed already. I think he is
perfectly correct to remind people that his blog is not the place for
LilyPond
Am 08.08.2013 13:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I were Daniel, I'd be pissed already. I think he is
perfectly correct to remind people that
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of which soundfont is bundled? We distribute
Denemo with
Am 08.08.2013 14:02, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of which
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am 08.08.2013 13:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
He does have misconceptions about LilyPond, but his blog is not the
place to address them. Yes, that's unfortunate, but please behave
like one would expect guests to behave. We are not doing our case a
Am 08.08.2013 14:08, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Am 08.08.2013 14:02, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be to
add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get high-quality
audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free soundfonts or
whatever is useful to get this to work.
Agreed.
I have
Am 08.08.2013 15:19, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be to add
a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get high-quality audio
output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free soundfonts or whatever is
Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net writes:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:06:36 +0200
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
If I import some musicXML the virtual instruments sound
much better than the standard midi output of either timidity or
mac-quicktime.
Isn't this just a question of
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing a
Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all its related
tools for my everyday work.
So for me using
At 10:32 08/08/2013 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
I use LibreOffice because the default operation for text is
fine. If I was writing out complex math equations, it'd be a different story.
Surely not: you'd use LibreOffice's Math facility!
Brian Barker
Am 08.08.2013 17:40, schrieb Brian Barker:
At 10:32 08/08/2013 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
I use LibreOffice because the default operation for text is fine. If
I was writing out complex math equations, it'd be a different story.
Surely not: you'd use LibreOffice's Math facility!
Brian Barker
- Original Message -
From: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net
To: LilyPond Users lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Similarly LilyPond is probably not the most appropriate tool for most
people
Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net writes:
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not that surprised.
During the last few years I became something nerd-like. After beeing
a Mac-User for a long time, I now only use Ubuntu or Debian and all
its related tools for
on 2013-08-08 at 14:16 Urs Liska wrote:
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be
to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free
soundfonts or whatever is useful to get
Am 08.08.2013 18:05, schrieb luis jure:
on 2013-08-08 at 14:16 Urs Liska wrote:
What could be useful however (I don't know _anything_ about it) would be
to add a chapter to the documentation talking about how to get
high-quality audio output from/through LilyPond, referencing useful free
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Message-ID: 1375950947119-148848.p...@n5.nabble.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I agree. That's the main reason why I chose to write that comment on this
mailing list vs. his blog post ;)
David Kastrup wrote
SoundsFromSound lt;
soundsfromsound@
gt; writes:
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
Frankly, if I
@
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Message-ID:
1375950947119-148848.post@.nabble
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
LilyPond mentions.
As a former SCORE user, personally I
35 matches
Mail list logo
