Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2018-09-13 4:42 am, David Kastrup wrote: >> [...] If you write something like >> >> \stemDown \once \stemUp \stemNeutral >> >> what's the expectation for the current timestep, and what's the >> expectation for afterwards? > > If \stem(Up|Down|Neutral) were as simple as

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > Token(s)Stem.direction (Stack) > > \stemDown Down () > \once \stemUp <{> Up (Down) > \stemNeutral <...> (Down) > <}> Down () > > This behavior is

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-09-13 4:42 am, David Kastrup wrote: [...] If you write something like \stemDown \once \stemUp \stemNeutral what's the expectation for the current timestep, and what's the expectation for afterwards? If \stem(Up|Down|Neutral) were as simple as "Stem.direction := (Up|Down|Neutral)"

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
Edward Neeman writes: > Thanks David, that makes a lot of sense! > > With your explanation in mind I’m thinking the current implementation in best. Well, the problem really is finding an implementation that does not cause surprises. One could rather brutally restore all settings made inside of

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread Edward Neeman
Thanks David, that makes a lot of sense! With your explanation in mind I’m thinking the current implementation in best. Edward --- Dr. Edward Neeman www.neemanpianoduo.com > On 13 Sep 2018, at 9:42 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > David Kastrup mailto:d...@gnu.org>> writes: > >> Edward Neeman

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Edward Neeman writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This >> doesn’t work: >> >> >> >> \version "2.19.82" >> >> \relative { \stemUp 8) r8 >> \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r >> \stemNeutral

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
Edward Neeman writes: > Hello, > > I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This > doesn’t work: > > > > \version "2.19.82" > > \relative { \stemUp 8) r8 > \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r > \stemNeutral c,16 es ges bes } > > %%% > > Adding a

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-13 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2018-09-12 10:30 pm, Federico Bruni wrote: You are right, it seems weird. If you check your property-init.ly file you'll find these definitions: stemUp = \override Stem.direction = #UP stemDown = \override Stem.direction = #DOWN stemNeutral = \revert Stem.direction But I don't know what's

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-12 Thread Federico Bruni
You are right, it seems weird. If you check your property-init.ly file you'll find these definitions: stemUp = \override Stem.direction = #UP stemDown = \override Stem.direction = #DOWN stemNeutral = \revert Stem.direction But I don't know what's happening here. Il giorno gio 13 set 2018 alle

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-12 Thread Edward Neeman
Thanks for the reply. I still don’t understand why two \stemNeutral commands work differently to just one. Take out one of them in this example and it looks different: %%% \version "2.19.82" \relative { g' % default is \stemUp \stemUp 8 r8 \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r %

Re: stemNeutral problem

2018-09-12 Thread Federico Bruni
Il giorno gio 13 set 2018 alle 5:08, Edward Neeman ha scritto: Hello, I’ve come across some weird behaviour from the \stemNeutral command. This doesn’t work: \version "2.19.82" \relative { \stemUp 8) r8 \acciaccatura { \stemDown 8 } \stemUp r \stemNeutral c,16 es ges