RE: problems with cues

2019-12-17 Thread Peter Gentry
as testy remarks. If your ranting forces me to find a solution then that's good - I may even learn something. Cheers -Original Message- From: David Kastrup Sent: 16 December 2019 13:17 To: Peter Gentry Cc: Lilypond Users ; peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk Subject: Re: problems with cues

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-16 Thread David Kastrup
"Peter Gentry" writes: > This issue has been resolved with help from David. Unless one of the more helpful Davids on this list pitched in in private, I would not say that I had nearly enough information available to contribute anything that could in good conscience be called "help". This is

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

2019-12-13 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: >> Peter writes: >>> A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? >>> significant? >> It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font >> layout >> of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

2019-12-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> pango-font.cc emits the warning with %0X, so that U+ number is in > hex. BTW, I've now slightly adjusted the warning message in git to make LilyPond emit 'U+0092' instead of 'U+92' – the 'U+' notation should return at least four uppercase hex digits. Werner

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

2019-12-13 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-12-13 3:54 am, David Kastrup wrote: Peter writes: A regular oddity is the message no glyph for U+92 in the .off file ? significant? It means that in the given font there is no backslash. Text font layout of TeX fonts tends to be a bit weird but nevertheless this seems strange.

Re: [SPAM] Re: Re Problems with cues

2019-12-13 Thread David Kastrup
Please do not take discussions off the list without bothering to announce it. Resent, this time with list included. Peter writes: > Yes I did manually change using the Fresco snippet but only after the > problem in order to put all the files on the current version number. I > appreciate that

Re: Re Problems with cues

2019-12-12 Thread David Kastrup
"Peter Gentry" writes: > Thanks for that response David. I wonder if the cause is to be found on my > machine rather than in Lilypond. The cause is, according to the comparatively sparse and vague information you provided so far, your input never could have worked in the form you claim it did.

Re Problems with cues

2019-12-12 Thread Peter Gentry
Thanks for that response David. I wonder if the cause is to be found on my machine rather than in Lilypond. I have recently been looking at Python (to try and stimulate a few aged grey cells) to which end I have blundered about with Trinket and also installed Python3.8 (64bit). These efforts

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-11 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > Am Mi., 11. Dez. 2019 um 15:16 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : >> >> "Peter Gentry" writes: >> >> > It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous" >> > assumption that >> > >> > \book { >> > >> > Page layout stuff for front page >> > >> > } >> >

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-11 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Mi., 11. Dez. 2019 um 15:16 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > "Peter Gentry" writes: > > > It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous" > > assumption that > > > > \book { > > > > Page layout stuff for front page > > > > } > > > > \bookpart { > > > > Header &

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-11 Thread David Wright
On Wed 11 Dec 2019 at 15:16:04 (+0100), David Kastrup wrote: > "Peter Gentry" writes: > > It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous" > > assumption that > > \book { > > Page layout stuff for front page > > } > > \bookpart { > > Header & music > > } > >

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-11 Thread Phil Holmes
strup" To: "Peter Gentry" Cc: ; "Lilypond Users" Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:16 PM Subject: Re: problems with cues "Peter Gentry" writes: It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous" assumption that \book {

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-11 Thread David Kastrup
"Peter Gentry" writes: > It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous" > assumption that > > \book { > > Page layout stuff for front page > > } > > \bookpart { > > Header & music > > } > > \bookpart { > > Header & music > > } > > Was a way to go. > > > >

Re: problems with cues

2019-12-10 Thread David Kastrup
"Peter Gentry" writes: > David > > > > I'm sorry my explanations are not very clear, probably because I am a bit > confused. You did not answer a single of the questions I asked for clarification. > However I may be getting somewhere when the Header file is introduced > I get This is very