Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-29 Thread Tim Slattery
Noeck wrote: > >>> This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond. Which version do >>> you use? You can (for most settings) now forget about the #'. The scheme >>> value 'true' is still ##t. >> >> Is that true? I'm no Scheme expert, but I thought that the first # >> told Lily that you are

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Joram, Noted and thank you again. Mark -Original Message- From: Noeck [mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:01 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Rolled Chord Hi Mark, glad that I could help. The table has some mistakes: - no

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
Hi Mark, glad that I could help. The table has some mistakes: - no \set in \with and \context - no # for first tweak argument You might find more. It should read: in blocksetting context properties setting graphical object properties -

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
t: Re: Rolled Chord Hi Mark, I think you do not really need scheme for what you want to do here. You just need to know, that LilyPond uses the # sign to switch to the scheme mode and properties are set or overriden with scheme values. #(here you can put a whole scheme function) or just a single

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Joram, Thank you for the table. Speaking only for myself, it does answer many questions. Mark -Original Message- From: Noeck [mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:08 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Rolled Chord Hi, here is a

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
Hi, here is a little table how to change the defaults. You need to know if it is a context property or an object property and if you want to apply it for globally (layout), for a score (layout), for a specific context (with), at a point in time of the music (music) or for a single object (tweak).

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
Hi Mark, I think you do not really need scheme for what you want to do here. You just need to know, that LilyPond uses the # sign to switch to the scheme mode and properties are set or overriden with scheme values. #(here you can put a whole scheme function) or just a single value #scheme-value

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
boolean. Of the use of " \set " and the hash marks, I did not. Learning some basic syntax and grammar of Scheme would help me. Any suggestions? Mark -Original Message- From: Noeck [mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:44 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek; l

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
> Gentlemen, > > I have tried both (in 2.18), > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t, works > \set tieWaitForNote = #t, does not work. > > Mark I think nobody said that it should work. In both ways of thinking, you need ##t - switch to scheme syntax with # and then the scheme true value #t (this is what

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
, January 28, 2014 9:12 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Rolled Chord >> This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond. Which version do >> you use? You can (for most settings) now forget about the #'. The >> scheme value 'true' is still ##t.

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
>> This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond. Which version do >> you use? You can (for most settings) now forget about the #'. The scheme >> value 'true' is still ##t. > > Is that true? I'm no Scheme expert, but I thought that the first # > told Lily that you are using Scheme code, an

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Tim Slattery
Noeck wrote: >This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond. Which version do >you use? You can (for most settings) now forget about the #'. The scheme >value 'true' is still ##t. Is that true? I'm no Scheme expert, but I thought that the first # told Lily that you are using Scheme code,

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread David Kastrup
Noeck writes: > Hi Mark, > > >> My limited experience with the computer language for commands suggests two >> things. >> 1. The command requires a " = t." It should be tieWaitForNote = t. >> 2. Commands can contain other symbols, "\," " ' (apostrophe), " and " #. " > > This got much easier in re

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-28 Thread Noeck
Hi Mark, > My limited experience with the computer language for commands suggests two > things. > 1. The command requires a " = t." It should be tieWaitForNote = t. > 2. Commands can contain other symbols, "\," " ' (apostrophe), " and " #. " This got much easier in recent versions of LilyPond.

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-27 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Chord Hi Mark, > > What term should be used to search the manual for instructions for > creating the rolled chord in the attachment? > > tieWaitForNote > > Hope this helps! > Kieren It's in the manual go tot the section where ties are explained and look in

RE: Rolled Chord

2014-01-27 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
ot; #. " Should any of these be included. Mark -Original Message- From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:23 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List Subject: Re: Rolled Chord Hi Mark, > What term should b

Re: Rolled Chord

2014-01-27 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Mark, > What term should be used to search the manual for instructions for creating > the rolled chord in the attachment? tieWaitForNote Hope this helps! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/m