David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
I expect it to just output a scale with a double-stemmed g.
[slightly fixed code quoted]
\version 2.17.95
doubleStem =
#(define-music-function
(parser location note)
(ly:music?)
#{
{ \voiceOne
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:58 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
See issue 3673. If that makes it in, you can do
doubleStem =
#(define-music-function
(parser location note)
(ly:music?)
(make-relative (note) note
#{
{ \voiceOne $note } \new Voice { \voiceTwo $note }
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:58 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
See issue 3673. If that makes it in, you can do
doubleStem =
#(define-music-function
(parser location note)
(ly:music?)
(make-relative (note) note
#{
{ \voiceOne
2013/11/22 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
#(defmacro-public make-relative (variables reference music)
The list of pitch or music variables in @var{variables} is used as
a sequence for creating relativable music from @var{music}.
When the constructed music is used outside of @code{\\relative},
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/22 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
#(defmacro-public make-relative (variables reference music)
The list of pitch or music variables in @var{variables} is used as
[...]
in contrast, does not make sense.
;; pitch and music generator
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
\version 2.17.95
doubleStem =
#(define-music-function
(parser location note)
(ly:music?)
#{
{ \voiceOne #note } \new Voice { \voiceTwo #note } \oneVoice
#})
melody = \relative c' {
c4 d e f
2013/11/21 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
David Kastrup wrote
As a rule, don't use a music argument twice without copying in the same
expression. \music copies music, just like $music does. #music is very
Scheme-like: it does not change anything. Often, that's what you want.
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
That is starting to make sense, after reading it a few times :) I've
replaced #note with $note in both cases in the function and it works
properly. Thanks!
I need to go back and re-read the part about the difference between # and $
in Scheme
James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all,
I'm making my first forays into Scheme by adapting preexisting examples to
do what I need.
Question: Why does the following code produce the output as shown in the
attached png image? I expect it to just output a scale with a
and $variable inside a function covered
in LilyPond's reference? I can't find it there, and I'd love to understand
this better.
Thanks and take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Scheme-function-question-tp154227p154239.html
Sent from the User mailing
Hello all,
I'm making my first forays into Scheme by adapting preexisting examples to
do what I need.
Question: Why does the following code produce the output as shown in the
attached png image? I expect it to just output a scale with a
double-stemmed g.
\version 2.17.95
doubleStem =
Thanks a lot, Janek! I will read the whole thing tonight.
Take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Scheme-function-question-tp154227p154242.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
