Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-15 Thread Jan-Peter Voigt
Hi Urs, Am 13.07.2018 um 17:59 schrieb Urs Liska: > In recent weeks (as you'll have noticed) I had the wonderful opportunity > to work on it on a partially paid basis: I had to implement some > functionality and was in essence paid to work on that for 7x8 hours. > What had to be created amounted

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-15 Thread Urs Liska
Am 15. Juli 2018 01:46:00 MESZ schrieb Craig Dabelstein : >Hi Urs, > >My mistake. Once I had pulled all the changes compiling times were >fine. > Oh, so glad to hear that! >Craig > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-14 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Urs, My mistake. Once I had pulled all the changes compiling times were fine. Craig On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 16:48, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Am 14.07.2018 um 01:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: > > Hi Urs, > > Just confirming, as you've discovered, that compiling is lots slower. > >

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-14 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 13.07.2018 17:59, Urs Liska wrote: In recent weeks (as you'll have noticed) I had the wonderful opportunity to work on it on a partially paid basis: I had to implement some functionality and was in essence paid to work on that for 7x8 hours. What had to be created amounted to "half" an

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-14 Thread Urs Liska
Am 14.07.2018 um 01:58 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Urs, I've been looking at the Latex integration (lycritrprt) but I'm afraid it's a bit over my head. I'd need a couple of pointers into making it work before I could play with it and test it. Craig Well, I just tried to do a minimal

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-14 Thread Urs Liska
Hi Craig, Am 14.07.2018 um 01:00 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Urs, Just confirming, as you've discovered, that compiling is lots slower. Craig Could you please be more specific? This assessment is somewhat surprising to me (although I wouldn't deny it's possible) because the slow-down

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-13 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Urs, I've been looking at the Latex integration (lycritrprt) but I'm afraid it's a bit over my head. I'd need a couple of pointers into making it work before I could play with it and test it. Craig On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 09:00, Craig Dabelstein wrote: > Hi Urs, > > Just confirming, as

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-13 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Urs, Just confirming, as you've discovered, that compiling is lots slower. Craig On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 08:04, Craig Dabelstein wrote: > Hi Urs, > > I've been converting one of my old projects to the new versions to test > for you and so far it has all worked perfectly. You are a genius!

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-13 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Hi Urs, I've been converting one of my old projects to the new versions to test for you and so far it has all worked perfectly. You are a genius! I haven't got to the Latex integration yet (so please don't delete the temp-print-message branch of scholarly just yet!) All the best, Craig On

Re: Some openLilyLib packages/modules open for testing

2018-07-13 Thread Urs Liska
As suspected the post below wasn't delivered (at least not yet) due to the large attachments. The two files mentioned in the text can temporarily be downloaded from https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/bhN8Kd5MxdgjAea and https://cloud.ursliska.de/s/0LRvGdvL4azL4Za Am 13.07.2018 um 17:31 schrieb Urs