Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Colin Hall
I'm not top posting. Tim McNamara timmcn at bitstream.net writes: 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James Worlton. Updated status below. In this table below ok

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Hans Aikema
On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page clearly says MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported..

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread James
hello, On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net wrote: On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology.  The

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread James
Hello again, On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net wrote: On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology.  

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread David Kastrup
Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net writes: On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page clearly

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/3/10 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is missing afaics on the pages in Czech (cs), Hungarian (hu),

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread ole
Am 10.03.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Colin Hall: I'm not top posting. Tim McNamara timmcn at bitstream.net writes: 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread David Kastrup
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: 2012/3/10 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is missing

Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Colin Hall
ok | |-+-+-| I have conflicting reports for the status of Lilypond on MacOS X 10.4.11 on x86 processors. Feel free to give it a try and let me know what you find. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ lilypond

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Tim McNamara
2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page clearly says MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.. As such, any failure to run on 10.7 is