Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, I'm rapidly approaching the first really public release of my 'lilyglyphs' LaTeX package. lilyglyphs makes LilyPond's notational elements available as 'characters' in LaTeX documents. Glyphs from Emmentaler are accessed directly, everything else through small PDF files generated with

Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread flup2
your work as an opportunity to look at XeLaTeX. I'll take a look at glyphs combinations that could be usefull; octaviation clefs, for instance. Thanks for your awesome work! Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Testers-needed-for-lilyglyphs-package

Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread Mike Solomon
On 2 sept. 2013, at 16:40, flup2 phili...@philmassart.net wrote: Hello, I'll take some time later this week to look carefully, but a first good news is that I was able to compile the manual after installing the missing fonts on 2 different computers :-) 2 years ago, I developed such a

Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread Urs Liska
commands the package can grow significantly faster. (I wouldn't try to create octaviation clefs on the LaTeX side but definitely through the pdf images BTW). Best Urs Thanks for your awesome work! Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Testers-needed

Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread Urs Liska
Am 02.09.2013 16:42, schrieb Mike Solomon: On 2 sept. 2013, at 16:40, flup2 phili...@philmassart.net wrote: Hello, I echo Philippe's compliments - this is truly incredible, Urs. Thanks! I won't have time to test it until later, but I know I will be a frequent user! Then _please_ get it

Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

2013-09-02 Thread Davide Liessi
2013/9/2 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: I'm rapidly approaching the first really public release of my 'lilyglyphs' LaTeX package. [...] This is really good news! I should be able to test your package with LuaLaTeX in the next days. I skimmed through the manual and, as others have already said,