On 14 May 2010 18:06, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> It's still on my list of things to do should I ever get enough time, though.
> (Which is probably never, so I would encourage everyone to look at this
> bug...)
This looks like a similar problem to issue 305. It would be trivial
to enhance the p
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:57:22PM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> But I feel also sad that this issue (about something very "simple",
> common) is still unsolved (2 years after).
Heh, you think that's bad? From 4 years ago:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11
(image on comment 9
2010/5/14 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Welcome to the club... I ran into that problem two years ago, and I
> haven't yet found a solution:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-03/msg00232.html
>
> It's still on my list of things to do should I ever get enough time,
> though.
Hi Rein
Am Freitag, 14. Mai 2010, 17:18:38 schrieben Sie:
> I tried Reinhold's new postfix \cresc with
> \override DynamicTextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1.0
> but unfortunately, although the dashed line is not printed, it is still
> taken into account when calculating the Y-offset of the \cresc .
[...]
>
Hi!
I'm trying to do something very simple (basically a Dynamic directly
followed by a textual crescendo *without dashed line*), but I'm not
able to achieve the output I want.
I tried Reinhold's new postfix \cresc with
\override DynamicTextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1.0
but unfortunately, althou
