> Thanks for your contributions. They inspired me to an easy bypass:
> ties may not work between staves, but slurs do, and the difference
> is not really conspicuous. [...]
By the way, the original problem is an ooold bug:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/555
Werner
\voiceOne b4) \change Staff = "up" s4 %
2
}
Also, just for future reference, if you just have one slur or tie (or other
things like fematas) to change up or down, you can use the direction
indicators:
b2_( % slur down
b2^( % slur up
--
Knute Snortum
Van Bruwaene wrote:
> Is there a simple solution for putting a tie between staves of a pianostaff?
> I need to tie a note of the lower voice on the upper staff to a note of the
> upper voice on the lower staff. I found this on StackExchange:
> https://music.stackexchange.com/que
On Wed 08 May 2024 at 13:40:23 (+), Kris Van Bruwaene wrote:
> Is there a simple solution for putting a tie between staves of a pianostaff?
> I need to tie a note of the lower voice on the upper staff to a note of the
> upper voice on the lower staff. I found this on StackExchange:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:41 AM Kris Van Bruwaene wrote:
> Is there a simple solution for putting a tie between staves of a
> pianostaff? I need to tie a note of the lower voice on the upper staff to a
> note of the upper voice on the lower staff. I found this on StackExchange
Is there a simple solution for putting a tie between staves of a pianostaff? I
need to tie a note of the lower voice on the upper staff to a note of the upper
voice on the lower staff. I found this on StackExchange:
https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/74383/lilypond-ties-across-staves
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:38 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
>
>
> \version "2.25.13"
>
> \relative {
>\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c~ } c4
> }
>
>
Works great! Thanks.
--
Knute Snortum
On 2024-03-22 8:24 am, Knute Snortum wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to tie an afterGrace note to the next note and I get a
warning. This code:
\version "2.25.13"
\relative {
\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 c~ } c4
}
...produces this warning:
/tmp/frescobaldi-ieh3nrny/tmpq4qpjmjp/doc
Hi all,
I am trying to tie an afterGrace note to the next note and I get a
warning. This code:
\version "2.25.13"
\relative {
\afterGrace c''4\trill { b16 c~ } c4
}
...produces this warning:
/tmp/frescobaldi-ieh3nrny/tmpq4qpjmjp/document.ly:4:33 <0>: warning:
unterminated
I often resolve squished ties like that by flipping the tie; e.g., using
*fis^~* to force the tie on top, or *fis_~* to force it to the bottom.
(In this case, it looks good on top, but this doesn't help if you really
want it on the bottom.)
Regards,
Curt
On 2/11/24 09:30, George wrote:
bar 78
Sorry for short answer, I’m on the phone:
Try \tweak Tie.minimum-length #10
And then choose an appropriate number.
> 11 feb. 2024 kl. 18:31 skrev George :
>
>
> At the moment I am having an issue with a tie from the alto part where it is
> automatically "squished&quo
have any impact except that it will extend some of these
squished ties.
Let me know if this works for you.
-William
On 2/11/24 12:30, George wrote:
At the moment I am having an issue with a tie from the alto part where
it is automatically "squished" by Lillypond. I didn't find
At the moment I am having an issue with a tie from the alto part where it
is automatically "squished" by Lillypond. I didn't find an answer anywhere
else on how to create some space between or make the tie somewhat
noticeable. Also using the command* \shape* on the tie was not the ri
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Check \repeatTie.
Thanks Jean, that's it!
-David
Check \repeatTie.
I'm trying to re-engrave a single line that occurs in the middle of a
piece. The idea is to copy the existing engraving exactly, but with
some modifications. The line in question starts with a tie from the
last note in the line above, like this:
How can I achieve this in isolation, without
Thank you everyone! I got the slurs formatted correctly.
\version "2.22.1"
\header {
title = "Yo sé a Quién he creído"
composer = "James McGranaham"
poet = "Daniel W. Whittle, tr. Samuel L. Sloniker"
copyright = \markup {
\center-column {
"Traducción © 2023 Samuel L. Sloniker"
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le samedi 28 octobre 2023 à 21:21 -0400, Samuel Sloniker a écrit :
>> How can I format this tie in Lilypond? I'm writing a Lilypond file for an
>> existing song; this image is from a scan of a hymnal.
>
>
> If you are having tr
Le samedi 28 octobre 2023 à 21:21 -0400, Samuel Sloniker a écrit :
> How can I format this tie in Lilypond? I'm writing a Lilypond file for an
> existing song; this image is from a scan of a hymnal.
If you are having trouble finding the answer to this in the documentation or Web
searches
> How can I format this tie in Lilypond? I'm writing a Lilypond file
> for an existing song; this image is from a scan of a hymnal.
```
{
<< { a'8[( g']) } \\
{ e'4 } >>
}
```
Werner
Hello,
How can I format this tie in Lilypond? I'm writing a Lilypond file for an
existing song; this image is from a scan of a hymnal.
-Samuel Sloniker
Le dimanche 14 mai 2023 à 17:24 +0100, Graham King a écrit :
> I'm setting a song with multiple verses, one of which starts with a syllable
> spanning two notes. I'd like a dotted tie in the score, but how best to
> achieve that?
Temporarily unset melismaBusyProperties like:
```
I'm setting a song with multiple verses, one of which starts with a syllable
spanning two notes. I'd like a dotted tie in the score, but how best to
achieve that?
\version "2.25.0"
notes = \repeat volta 2 { d'2 d'2 e'2. 4 }
words = \lyricmode {
<< { Lo -- rem ip -- sum }
John McWilliam writes:
> I’m trying to get a tie to cross the barline into a split voice
> measure. I have tried with and without the \voiceOne command but
> cannot get this to work. Can any one help me?
First let's point out everything you get "cargo-cult" wrong, having
John,
Le mercredi 19 avril 2023 à 16:25 +0200, John McWilliam a écrit :
> Hi,
> I’m trying to get a tie to cross the barline into a split
> voice measure. I have tried with and without the \voiceOne command but cannot
> get this to work. Can any
Hi, I’m trying to get a tie to cross the barline into a split voice measure. I have tried with and without the \voiceOne command but cannot get this to work. Can any one help me? John McWilliam Sent from Mail for Windows
Voice_with_tie.ly
Description: Binary data
It took some digesting, but it behaves as desired:
[image: image.png]
Thanks!
Mike Dean
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:49 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le lundi 17 avril 2023 à 16:46 -0700, Mike Dean a écrit :
>
> I am needing to figure out how to best tie a note...
>
> \
es
for more explanations.
/Mats
*From:*lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] *On Behalf
Of *Mike Dean
*Sent:* Monday, April 17, 2023 8:03 PM
*To:* Lilypond-User Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: Unterminated terminat
Mike,
Try using \stemDown
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Dean
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 8:03 PM
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Unterminated terminated tie
Le lundi 17 avril 2023 à 16:46 -0700, Mike Dean a écrit :
> I am needing to figure out how to best tie a note...
>
> \version "2.24.0"
> \relative c' {
> \key af \major
> \time 2/4
> \tempo "Not fast"
> ef8 c' ~c16 bf af g f ef8
gt; *From:* lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org [mailto:
> lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike
> Dean
> *Sent:* Monday, April 17, 2023 4:47 PM
> *To:* Lilypond-User Mailing List
> *Subject:* Unterminated terminated tie
>
>
>
&
I am needing to figure out how to best tie a note...
\version "2.24.0"
\relative c' {
\key af \major
\time 2/4
\tempo "Not fast"
ef8 c' ~c16 bf af g f ef8 df16 c8 bf16 af g af bf c df ef f g af8 r r4
\repeat volta 2 {
c8 c4 ef8 f16 (ef8) f16 (ef) f16 (ef8)
Thanks a lot. I didn't know outside-staff-priority is available with Tie.
However, a tenuto is distant a bit from a note with this way.
(Script position seems to be calculated closer to tie than note.)
I think modifying the priority is conceptually more appropriate, but forcing
the offset
Thanks. It's an actual tie, so a slur is not suitable.
My example was too simple to represent a real situation, that some objects
interrupt a tie.
{
\override Tie.staff-position = 5
c''1--~
\key des \major
\time 12/8
c''1.
}
Akikazu
On 2023/03/26 4:07, Knute Snortum wrote
On 2023-03-26 4:45 am, Mark Mathias wrote:
Perhaps try:
\version "2.24.0"
{
\override Tie.outside-staff-priority = #1375
c''1--~ c''
c''1--~ c''
}
%
And, of course, add "\once" for a particular instance.
When you find you are doing \once \override, you should
t; In this case, the tenuto should be placed immediately above the note.
>> Perhaps overriding Script.extra-offset is one of solutions, but is there
>> another property controlling the priority of Tie and Script?
>>
>
> Does it have to be a tie? It looks more like a slur, in whic
ry is better.
>
> e.g.
>
> \version "2.24.0"
> {
>\override Tie.staff-position = 5
>c''1--~ c''
> }
>
>
> In this case, the tenuto should be placed immediately above the note.
> Perhaps overriding Script.extra-offset is one of solutio
the tenuto should be placed immediately above the note.
Perhaps overriding Script.extra-offset is one of solutions, but is there
another property controlling the priority of Tie and Script?
Akikazu
On 31/01/2023 23:06, Steve Carlock wrote:
> Jean,
>
> Thank you for approving my email - I did subscribe using the website and
> confirmed the email (and have logged into my account page successfully) prior
> to sending my email to the list. Maybe I was impatient and needed to wait a
> day for
t;
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
>
>
> The order of elements for a note is
>
>
>
>
> In "g~1", you have
>
>
>
> Thus the "g~" part is understood as a g note that implicitly
> inherits the duration of the previous note, with a tie, and
> the "1" part is the duration of a new note, which inherits
> the pitch of the previous note. You want "g1~" instead.
>
> By the way, you can simplify
>
> 1
>
> into
>
> 1~
>
> Jean
>
>
The tie ~ and number 1 in measure 3 are in the wrong order, the tie should
come after the number.
What happens is that Lilypond, when it sees a pitch or duration alone
interprets it as a new note, with the missing pitch or duration carried over
from the previous note. So g~1 becomes a g
Hi Steve,
welcome to the group!
In your third measure, Instead of
g~1
you should write
g1~
Your sequence means the following:
- g without a duration uses the last duration specified, i.e. whole note
from the measure before.
- ~ produces a tie to the following note.
- 1 without a pitch
;
> What am I doing wrong?
The order of elements for a note is
In "g~1", you have
Thus the "g~" part is understood as a g note that implicitly
inherits the duration of the previous note, with a tie, and
the "1" part is the duration of a new note, which
New Lilypond user here. The following code is not working as I expect:
\version "2.24.0"
\language "english"
\score {
<<
\new Staff {
\key d \major
\time 4/4
\relative c' {
1 | 1 | g~1 | g2 2 |
}
}
>>
\layout { }
}
I expect to see 4 measures with ties between
syllables on one note. In lyricmode I'd write the ~, but this
> > doesn't work in regular markup. Is there a way to add that kind of text
> > syllable tie to markup as well? Or should I simply look for some
> > tie-like unicode character?
> >
> > \version "2.24.0&qu
Stephan Schöll writes:
> Hi everybody
>
> I have stanzas 2..n put as markup below the score. In one stanza there
> are two syllables on one note. In lyricmode I'd write the ~, but this
> doesn't work in regular markup. Is there a way to add that kind of text
> syllable tie
Hi everybody
I have stanzas 2..n put as markup below the score. In one stanza there
are two syllables on one note. In lyricmode I'd write the ~, but this
doesn't work in regular markup. Is there a way to add that kind of text
syllable tie to markup as well? Or should I simply look for some
tie
Hi Jean,
Le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 à 11:23, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
...
> This is nice! Just a thought: why use after-line-breaking
> here?
...
Bad habit? Respond without thinking long enough? Too proud it'd worked?
Missing knowledge? All?... Yeah, probably all...
> This is the sort of thing
Le 10/11/2022 à 04:31, Pierre Perol-Schneider a écrit :
How about:
\version "2.22.0"
oldTie = \once \override Tie.after-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(let*
((stencil (ly:tie::print grob))
(dir (ly:grob-property grob 'direction))
(markup-stencil
Perol-Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 9:31 PM
To: Andrew Bernard
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Tie with slash (caesura) on the curve
Hi Andrew, Hi Dirck,
Le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 à 02:40, Andrew Bernard
mailto:andrew.bern...@mailbox.org>> a écrit :
Never say an
Hi Andrew, Hi Dirck,
Le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 à 02:40, Andrew Bernard a
écrit :
> Never say anything is technically unplayable for pianists. Some of the
> technical ability of contemporary players leaves me breathless.
>
...
Actually it's for guitarists ;)
On 10/11/2022 12:02 pm, Dirck Nagy wrote:
Never say anything is technically unplayable for pianists. Some of the
technical ability of contemporary players leaves me breathless.
What you are after perhaps is an editorial tie. Dorico has them, with a
single bar through the middle. I know its not exactly the same. I'm sure
I have come
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:30 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 17/09/2022 à 20:24, Knute Snortum a écrit :
[snip]
> > Is this a bug? Is there a better way to deal with it?
> >
> > --
> > Knute Snortum
>
>
> Yeah, known long-standing issue.
>
>
Le 17/09/2022 à 20:24, Knute Snortum a écrit :
I have run into a situation that may be a bug or it may be I'm not
doing something correctly. I have a \voiceOne note at a line break
where the tie becomes nearly invisible.
%%%
\version "2.23.12"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
I have run into a situation that may be a bug or it may be I'm not
doing something correctly. I have a \voiceOne note at a line break
where the tie becomes nearly invisible.
%%%
\version "2.23.12"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0
}
\relative {
\voiceOne
d''8( c4 b a e'8
> I guess I was thinking it might be easier/clearer for documentation,
> since people wouldn't have to search for "repeat tie" as opposed to
> "laissez vibrer" to get the two different versions of what is
> ultimately the same thing.
The current git version
On 2022-07-28 6:29 am, David Kastrup wrote:
\laissezvibrer might be an alias,
though I am not sure whether it would not, in that function, be
deserving of some tweaks giving it a longer minimal visual length.
Isn't it also conventional to annotate it "l.v."?
If we had a more genera
on, since people wouldn't have to search for "repeat tie" as opposed
to "laissez vibrer" to get the two different versions of what is ultimately the
same thing.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> I don't see why. They are halfties.
>
> So why not \halftie #LEFT and \halftie #RIGHT?
> (i.e., they're both halfties, so just have a direction parameter)
There isn't much of an incentive to ever have the halftie direction
computed in any manner, so
Hi all,
> I don't see why. They are halfties.
So why not \halftie #LEFT and \halftie #RIGHT?
(i.e., they're both halfties, so just have a direction parameter)
Just a thought.
Kieren.
; So there is a clear pattern of \startItem and \endItem being opposite
> ends of a single thing.
>
>
> But the same words used a bit differently might work, so that "the
> start of a tie" could be called \tieStart and so on (\tieEnd,
> \slurStart, \slurEnd).
start/end is
being opposite ends of a
single thing.
But the same words used a bit differently might work, so that "the start of a
tie" could be called \tieStart and so on (\tieEnd, \slurStart, \slurEnd).
Paul
there.
> Exactly, I think this would be very misleading.
I don't see why. They are halfties. When there is a discontinuity
between timeflow and typesetting direction, you have to pick one of them
to describe the direction of the tie. As I wrote, left/right don't work
well on their own, so I
, but then is the tie
pointing to the left, or is it supposed to be at the left end of a
repeat section? I thought start/stop would be less ambiguous even if
somewhat uglier.
I find it difficult to come up with something succinct—
\halfTieToTheLeft and \halfTieToTheRight would be clear, but way too
tion of terms for
>> the two different half ties you need to deal with in the context of
>> repeats or other visual non-linearities.
>
> I completely agree. Since there are other applications for a half tie, the
> name shouldn't be \laissezvibrer.
>>
>> \star
al with in the context of
>> repeats or other visual non-linearities.
>>
>
> I completely agree. Since there are other applications for a half tie, the
> name shouldn't be \laissezvibrer.
>
>>
>> \startTie and \stopTie would make a lot more sense (even though
isual non-linearities.
>
I completely agree. Since there are other applications for a half tie, the
name shouldn't be \laissezvibrer.
>
> \startTie and \stopTie would make a lot more sense (even though they
> don't need to be matched at all). \laissezvibrer might be an alias,
> though
Kenneth Wolcott writes:
> Hi Hwaen and David;
>
> Thank you very much for your replies.
>
> It does solve the problem.
>
> I saw that command but, for some reason I did not think it applied
> to my situation.
The current naming is a drag.
"\repeatTie" and "\laissezvibrer" are a stupid
quot; list.
Ken
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:55 PM David Wright wrote:
>
> On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 21:27:53 (-0700), Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> >
> > I must be missing something obvious here.
> >
> > The last note of a first alternative is a tie to the first note in th
On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 21:27:53 (-0700), Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>
> I must be missing something obvious here.
>
> The last note of a first alternative is a tie to the first note in the
> repeat.
>
> Lilypond 2.22.2 complains:
>
> La_Bamba.ly:67:40: warning: un
Greetings Ken,
I wonder if this isn't a place for \laissezVibrer
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 7/28/22, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I must be missing something obvious here.
>
> The last note of a first alternative is a tie to the first note in the
> repeat.
>
> L
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:06 AM Thomas Morley wrote:
> You could do
>
> \relative a,, {
> \clef bass
> \time 6/8
>
> 4.(~
>
> \once \override TieColumn.tie-configuration = #'((-1 . 1)(-10 . -1))
>
> q8 ) |
> }
>
> Also, see NR about TieColum
Am Mi., 20. Juli 2022 um 02:17 Uhr schrieb Knute Snortum :
>
> I'm trying to adjust the Y position of a tie in a chord, but I'm
> having trouble. What works for a single tie doesn't seem to work for
> a chord:
>
> %%%
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> moveTie = {
>
Of Knute Snortum
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 5:17 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Moving a tie in a chord
I'm trying to adjust the Y position of a tie in a chord, but I'm having
trouble. What works for a single tie doesn't seem to work for a chord:
%%%
\version "2.22.2"
mov
I'm trying to adjust the Y position of a tie in a chord, but I'm
having trouble. What works for a single tie doesn't seem to work for
a chord:
%%%
\version "2.22.2"
moveTie = {
\once \override Tie.staff-position = -5
\once \override Tie.direction = #DOWN
}
\relative a,, {
I have gotten to where I can do what I intended to do today and now I may
have the patience to read. Thank you for all your help!
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:25 AM Carl Sorensen
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:16 AM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As for the
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:16 AM Andrew Musselman
wrote:
> As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf
> when I do this to remove all complexity:
>
> \version "2.22.2"
> \key d \major
> {
> a
> }
>
put the first brace before \key and it will give you what you want.
>
>
>
>
> *From: *lilypond-user gmail@gnu.org> on behalf of Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, June 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM
> *To: *lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Subject: *Re: Key and tie questions
>
> As for the key signature, I am
From: lilypond-user
on behalf of Andrew Musselman
Date: Friday, June 3, 2022 at 1:16 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Key and tie questions
As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf when I
do this to remove all complexity:
\version "2.22.2"
As for the key signature, I am still seeing nothing about key in the pdf
when I do this to remove all complexity:
\version "2.22.2"
\key d \major
{
a
}
Log says:
$ lilypond -f pdf the-mountain.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.22.2 (running Guile 2.2)
Processing `the-mountain.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting
Okay subtle but I do see the difference; thank you
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 10:07 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Andrew Musselman writes:
>
> > I got a beam by adding `\(` and `\)` around the b and c, looks good.
>
> That's not a beam but a phrasing slur, and at that point in the score, a
> phrasing
Andrew Musselman writes:
> I got a beam by adding `\(` and `\)` around the b and c, looks good.
That's not a beam but a phrasing slur, and at that point in the score, a
phrasing slur seems like an odd choice: it usually extends over whole
phrases rather than joining two notes. You probably
A tie from the b cannot be terminated because there is no following b!
If you're trying to tie from the c in the middle of the triplet to the c after
it, put the tilde next to it - of course, this will fail by default, but can be
enabled to succeed by using: \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
Paul
ppress this, consider adding a spacer rest
\relative
Now the second score is what follows within braces.
> and when I try to put a tie between the triplet and the next note and put a
> tilde after the `b` in the triplet I get this error:
>
> Interpreting music...
> the-m
lative
> \key d \major
> {
> <<
> {
> a'8 g'8 \tuplet 3/1 {f' c' b} c'8 c'2
> }
> >>
> }```
>
> and when I try to put a tie between the triplet and the next note and put
> a tilde after the `b` in the triplet I get this error:
>
>
Hi all, I'm not seeing a key signature show up when I do this:
```\version "2.22.2"
\relative
\key d \major
{
<<
{
a'8 g'8 \tuplet 3/1 {f' c' b} c'8 c'2
}
>>
}```
and when I try to put a tie between the triplet and the next note and pu
Hi Christel,
> If you think of a way: I'm definitely interested!
I do this kind of thing all the time: just use an arrow markup, disconnect it
from the spacing engine (there are a number of ways of doing this), and tack it
on to the repeat barline!
If you need more than that hint, I can whip
Le 19/05/2022 à 17:43, Christel le Pair a écrit :
Hello David,
Thank you for the quick response!
I'm working on a tablet, so I'm always on one page.
Indeed that would not be possible -> could give an error, like it more
often does ;-)
If you think of a way: I'm definitely interested!
Hi
> > \repeat volta 2 { c1 *(* }
> > \alternative
> > {
> > { e1*)* }
> > { d1*)* }
> > }
> > So I want to end the tie in the alternative options, but the 2nd one ends
> > with an error.
>
> Use \repeatTie instead of )
>
&g
{
> { e1*)* }
> { d1*)* }
> }
> So I want to end the tie in the alternative options, but the 2nd one ends
> with an error.
Use \repeatTie instead of )
> Question 2:
> I would like to have an arrow from the end to the beginning of a repeat,
> normally when it is some lines
Hello Lilypond,
I'm so happy with your tool.
Just using it for my own use, have all b and # notes in red.
But here is my question... or actually I have 2:
Question 1:
\repeat volta 2 { c1 *(* }
\alternative
{
{ e1*)* }
{ d1*)* }
}
So I want to end the tie in the alternative
are:
• maintain as much as possible of the default Lilypond functionality
• the flatness/curviness adjustments
• the ability to make slurs asymmetric. This important for slurs with an
angle pg. 59),
• ability to have an incomplete flattened slur/tie for when system/page
breaks happen or other rare edge
Thank you Aaron for the 'extra-offset' formula. I will use it.
Thank you Jean for the \shape - I also tried to use it and failed; with
your example, it makes so much more sense and I begin to understand it.
On 2022-02-07 3:28 pm, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
For now, you have to use the \shape command documented at
The shape seems fine, just needs to be offset to optically align with
the slashed note heads:
music = { \time 3/4 2~4~8~8~2~16~8~16~4.~8 }
<<
\new RhythmicStaff { \music }
\new
Le 07/02/2022 à 23:58, Viktor Mastoridis a écrit :
Hello,
I am creating chord strumming indications with a tie.
I'm using the \improvisationOn handle, and the tie appears a bit too
high and to the right.
Using \override Tie.Y-offset I can move the tie vertically, but
\override Tie.X
Hello,
I am creating chord strumming indications with a tie.
I'm using the \improvisationOn handle, and the tie appears a bit too high
and to the right.
Using \override Tie.Y-offset I can move the tie vertically, but \override
Tie.X-offset yields no results.
I have searched across forums
Hello Adrian,
as Aaron said there are some arguments to defining functions to give access to
the parser and the layout that have been made optional since 2.20. That being
said, 2.18.2 is now nearly 8 years old. Unless there is a good reason for the
old version consider switching to a recent
On 2021-12-17 12:37 am, Adrian Oehm wrote:
I’ve tried the code you supplied, but unfortunately I keep getting the
following error:
"ly-syntax-constructors.scm:56:23: Wrong number of arguments to
#"
I get this trying to compile both with the code in my document and
also trying to compile yours.
t;> Can anyone point me in the right direction to solve this:
>>
>> I have the below, using a lyric tie,
>>
>>
>> but what i really want is what looks like a tie between notes that goes
>> fully between the ‘high’ and ‘in’, like I have drawn crudely below
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Adrian
>
That line at the bottom came from testing, so it should be ignored.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
1 - 100 of 1387 matches
Mail list logo
