Rune Zedeler wrote:
Not all regressions are caught by the regression test. For instance we -
for obvious reasons - have no "it must be possible to use all strings on
a tabstaff"-regression test. And it so happens that none of the
regression tests use the lowermost string. So even if (in your dr
Graham Percival skrev:
That's why we want a user to volunteer to check the regression tests. It
takes about 15 minutes a month, but it would drastically improve the
stability of lilypond.
Not all regressions are caught by the regression test. For instance we -
for obvious reasons - have no "i
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Graham Percival skrev:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
Will the original version be available somewhere, or is it lost forever
as soon as the convert-ly has been run?
It's lost.
If the original is lost I do not see a
Graham Percival skrev:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
Will the original version be available somewhere, or is it lost forever
as soon as the convert-ly has been run?
If the original is lost I do not see a need for a comment on when the
sni
On Nov 27, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
As an often confused but avid user of Lilypond, Graham's approach
would be welcome. It might explain to a user such as me why the
results obtained a
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/11/27, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Rune,
Valentin Villenave skrev:
--> First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
--> Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The snippets are supposed to be *all
Valentin Villenave wrote:
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops behaving correctly, the original author of
the snippet is gone, nobody any longer really remembers what the snippet
was supposed to do - then the version line will give a hi
2007/11/27, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Rune,
> Valentin Villenave skrev:
>
> > --> First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
> > --> Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
>
> What is the reason for this?
OK, let me explain more about it (I had a hard time u
Mats Bengtsson skrev:
Regarding information on the original author, this would certainly be
useful
for the LSR maintainer, but there are also good reasons not to publish
names
on a public web page, at least not with an email address.
Of course we should not automatically publish real names o
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Valentin Villenave skrev:
--> First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
--> Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops beh
Valentin Villenave skrev:
--> First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
--> Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops behaving correctly, the or
Hello everybody,
I'm sure you all know about the LilyPond Snippet Repository, this
wonderful place where anyone can share his ideas, examples, tips and
tricks about LilyPond. Nevertheless, let me tell you more about it.
A lot more, in fact (as you may notice, this mail is a bit long...).
I'm cur
12 matches
Mail list logo