Ok, thanks for the feedback. I went with "thickness" and 12 instead of 24 for
angle-increments. I've submitted a patch for review.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4418&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
-Paul_
Yeah, thickness would be good as well.
Thanks,
Janek
W dniu środa, 20 maja 2015 Carl Sorensen napisał(a):
>
>
> On 5/19/15 10:37 PM, "Janek Warchoł" > wrote:
>
> >
> >- I think "offset" should be renamed to "padding". Throughout LilyPond,
> >offsets are used to measure distances and position,
On 5/19/15 10:37 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>
>- I think "offset" should be renamed to "padding". Throughout LilyPond,
>offsets are used to measure distances and position, while padding is used
>for ensuring there's enough whitespace around an object.
I don't think it should be named "padding
Hi Paul,
thanks a lot for doing this! The result is quite impressive, i didn't
expect this approach to produce so nice whiteouts :)
I have just a couple cosmetic suggestions:
- I think "offset" should be renamed to "padding". Throughout LilyPond,
offsets are used to measure distances and positio
Hi Carl, Wilbert, David N, Kieren, Abraham,
Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions. I’m attaching a new revision.
- Original spacing is maintained. Thanks David and Carl for the tips on how to
do this.
- Optional parameters, with fallback defaults, for offset, color,
angle-increments, r
. Then again, perhaps I am just mistaken about
all this due to my ignorance of some core features/functions.
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/a-proper-whiteout-function-tp175593p176762.html
Sent from the
On 5/18/15 1:59 AM, "Wilbert Berendsen" wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>
>this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
>objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
>fix.
It should be very easy to fix. Just get the extents of the original
stencil, and apply them t
On 5/18/15 12:49 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>At any rate, there should probably be a user-specifiable way to change all
>three values that govern the performance, whether by context properties or
>by arguments.
As I think about it some more, perhaps the most logically-consistent set
of three
On 5/18/15 12:04 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
>> On May 17, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> This is a nice implementation -- I didn't think it could be done!
>
>Thanks Carl!
>
>> I think
>> it should be made part of LilyPond, if the performance hit is not too
>>big.
>> It seems to crea
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:14 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
>
>> > On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
>> >
>> > this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
>> > objects changes, influencing the
Hi Paul,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
> > On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> >
> > this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
> > objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
> > fix.
>
> Thanks! Yes I n
> On May 18, 2015, at 3:59 AM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
>
> this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
> objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
> fix.
Thanks! Yes I noticed that horizontal spacing is increased since the stencil
is wider (but
> On May 17, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> This is a nice implementation -- I didn't think it could be done!
Thanks Carl!
> I think
> it should be made part of LilyPond, if the performance hit is not too big.
> It seems to create a lot of stencils, but maybe that is no problem.
Hi Paul (et al.),
> I took Kieren up on his offer to sponsor a better whiteout stencil function.
> It’s attached so that anyone can make use of it.
Thanks for doing this! Looking forward to seeing it in action “in the wild”.
If anyone is willing to co-sponsor this function with me, please conta
Hi Paul,
this looks very nice! One thing I notice is that the size of the
objects changes, influencing the spacing. But that's probably easy to
fix.
--
Wilbert Berendsen
(http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
On 5/17/15 5:18 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Kieren MacMillan
>> wrote:
>>
>> What would be involved in making a real stencil whiteout function which
>>could be applicable to all grobs?
>
>Hi all, I took Kieren up on his offer to sponsor a better whiteout
>stencil
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Kieren MacMillan
> wrote:
>
> What would be involved in making a real stencil whiteout function which could
> be applicable to all grobs?
Hi all, I took Kieren up on his offer to sponsor a better whiteout stencil
function. It’s attached so that anyone can mak
On 04/29/2015 03:03 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Francisco,
To achieve a whiteout that is useful for music, I think a thick
default 'middle' stroke in white on a lower layer would work.
See example.
YES! This is exactly the kind of thing I’m hoping for.
+1.
Do you think this “function”
Hi Francisco,
> To achieve a whiteout that is useful for music, I think a thick
> default 'middle' stroke in white on a lower layer would work.
> See example.
YES! This is exactly the kind of thing I’m hoping for.
Do you think this “function” (bad choice of words here, I know) could be made
to
2015-04-29 13:30 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel :
> A
> minute of googling brought me to the following page, which nicely shows some
> difficulties, and illustrates why it requires significant effort:
> http://tavmjong.free.fr/blog/?p=1257
To achieve a whiteout that is useful for music, I think a thi
On 04/29/2015 12:04 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Kieren, Hi Carl,
I don't think that a standard scaling will help in this case.
Here's an illustration of what could happened :
\markup {
\combine
\with-color #magenta
\scale #'(1.2 . 1.2)
\musicglyph #"clefs.G"
\musicglyph
Just thinking...
Here's a rough path drawing that could do the job:
\version "2.19.19"
\markup {
\combine
\with-color #magenta
\path #0.3 #'(
(moveto 1.17 -0.50)
(curveto 1.24 -0.53 1.33 -0.43 1.24 -0.36)
(curveto 0.76 -0.07 0.82 0.57 1.49 0.62)
Hi Kieren, Hi Carl,
I don't think that a standard scaling will help in this case.
Here's an illustration of what could happened :
\markup {
\combine
\with-color #magenta
\scale #'(1.2 . 1.2)
\musicglyph #"clefs.G"
\musicglyph #"clefs.G"
}
Whatever glyph re-centering, you'll never get a
Another example: it’s currently impossible to whiteout LyricHyphen –
which would be nice in combination with SpanBar.
Yours, Simon
Am 29.04.2015 um 02:44 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi,
Forgive my ignorance, but could you just set the color of the grob to
white?
No: I want a black grob with
Kieren MacMillan wrote
> No: I want a black grob with a white outline (“padding”), for “layering”
> purposes.
I see. That makes sense. Sorry I can't be of more help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/a-proper-whiteout-function-tp175593p17564
Hi,
> Forgive my ignorance, but could you just set the color of the grob to white?
No: I want a black grob with a white outline (“padding”), for “layering”
purposes.
For reference, this is what happens with the current whiteout function:
I’m hoping to avoid the “boxy” look, which I find unat
Hi Carl,
>> 1. follow exactly the grob/glyph outline (i.e., not just a rectangle/box,
>> as currently implemented);
>> 2. include a parameter to set the thickness of the outline; and
>> 3. include a parameter to determine whether the whiteout was filled
>> throughout, or allowed ³holes² inside (as
b to white?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/a-proper-whiteout-function-tp175593p175638.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
On 4/28/15 8:57 AM, "Kieren MacMillan"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>What would be involved in making a real stencil whiteout function which
>could be applicable to all grobs?
>
>For it to Do The Right Thing, I imagine it should:
>1. follow exactly the grob/glyph outline (i.e., not just a rectangle/box,
Hi all,
What would be involved in making a real stencil whiteout function which could
be applicable to all grobs?
For it to Do The Right Thing™, I imagine it should:
1. follow exactly the grob/glyph outline (i.e., not just a rectangle/box, as
currently implemented);
2. include a parameter to se
30 matches
Mail list logo
