On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/3/23 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
James, what's the output of git --version?
From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ;
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:52:58PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/3/23 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
James, what's the output of git --version?
From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ;
Am 17.03.2009 um 10:39 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Hi James
You wrote Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:00 AM
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, James E. Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we
2009/3/23 James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com:
Attached is my attempt to make a .diff. It's my first time, so if I didn't
do it right, let me know. It's a learning process for me.
Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to generate the patch;
otherwise, use diff -u to obtain a diff
Am 23.03.2009 um 13:06 schrieb Francisco Vila:
2009/3/23 James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com:
Attached is my attempt to make a .diff. It's my first time, so if
I didn't
do it right, let me know. It's a learning process for me.
Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to
On 3/23/09 6:25 AM, James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you using Git? then use git-format-patch to generate the patch;
otherwise, use diff -u to obtain a diff with context lines.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
The incredible carnival of Badajoz
2009/3/23 Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
git format-patch is what you type at the command line.
I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
James, what's the output of git --version?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
The incredible
2009/3/23 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I have git version 1.5.6.3 and both git-format-patch and
git[nohyphen]format-patch do work.
James, what's the output of git --version?
From your patch I see it is 1.6.2.1 ; has the hyphenated command been
deprecated? this form is still useful
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, James E. Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't
confused by
the issue. (I've answered another
Hi James
You wrote Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:00 AM
On 17.03.2009, at 00:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, James E. Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:31:54AM +0100, James E. Bailey wrote:
I realise it's only been a week since this was last discussed, but:
a) no one who can say whether or not this can be implemented has
responded (ever)
Yes, this can be implemented.
I have no clue how complicated this may be,
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
last
week)
Yes, please do. Carl can help you get started as a Frog; we
desperately need more people
On 3/16/09 11:52 AM, James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16.03.2009, at 16:43, Graham Percival wrote:
c) Can we just make the change so that more people aren't confused by
the issue. (I've answered another question related to this in the
last
week)
Yes, please
derhindem...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org; lilypond-
devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: an LM update
Since I haven't heard any feedback, I thought I would post to the
- devel list as well. Incidentally, I've
- From: James E. Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org;
lilypond- devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: an LM update
Since I haven't heard any feedback, I thought I would post to
the - devel list
? I've no idea whether it is easy or
difficult.
Trevor
- Original Message - From: James E. Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org;
lilypond- devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: an LM update
Mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org;
lilypond-devel lilypond-de...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 9:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: an LM update
Since I haven't heard any feedback, I thought I would post to
the - devel list as well. Incidentally, I've answered questions
directly related
Since I haven't heard any feedback, I thought I would post to the -
devel list as well. Incidentally, I've answered questions directly
related to this twice in the last week or so.
Since the NR has the wonderful introduction to single-staff
polyphony, can this be simply inserted into the
Since the NR has the wonderful introduction to single-staff
polyphony, can this be simply inserted into the LM at the appropriate
point. I'm sure new users will have a much easier time of engraving
their music, and many problems can be avoided later if this topic is
presented in the LM the
19 matches
Mail list logo
