Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote: 1. Open Email 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply Yes. mutt! all-in-one, whether example is attached or inline =O] ((2Graham: i know you know,)) If someone sends an ly file that

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote: I greatly prefer having short snippets inline.  That way I can read them in my mail reader, rather than having to open them to see what's up. Ditto. If I ever want to compile one, I have a dedicated ~/toto.ly file that I

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:21:49AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote: 2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html This is rather for bug-lilypond, i'd say. In lilypond-user it is customary to send

bad cross-staff slurs

2010-10-03 Thread 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
Hello, A person reported that in the following harp passage of mine, the slurs are blurred with the notes. He read the score generated by 2.13.24, so: Is it still wrong in 2.13.35? How to solve the issue? Regards Haipeng \version 2.13.35 headsOn = \sequential { \override Dots #'transparent =

Re: bad cross-staff slurs

2010-10-03 Thread Phil Holmes
a lot of space to cross, and to my eye LilyPond does a fair job of fitting them in. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng To: lilypond-user Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 12:09 PM Subject: bad cross-staff slurs Hello, A person reported

Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number should be in inverted commas , and you have arpeggi which I assume should be arpeggio. I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this mailinglist

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 3 October 2010 14:36, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this mailinglist were posted as separate attachement(s) to the mail. I then just simply can save the snippet to disk. Now I first have to copy and

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread James Lowe
Hello, On 03/10/2010 13:36, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number should be in inverted commas , and you have arpeggi which I assume should be arpeggio. I personally would prefer it if

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote: 1. Open Email 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply Yes. If someone sends an ly file that is umpty-thrumpty lines long let's add one more point: 2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 10/3/10 6:36 AM, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number should be in inverted commas , and you have arpeggi which I assume should be arpeggio. I