- Original Message -
From: Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com
To: bobr...@centrum.is
Cc: Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de, lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:51:41 AM
Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:45:51PM +, bobr...@centrum.is
- Original Message -
From: Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 3:55:07 PM
Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
it automatically implies the end
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:45:51PM +, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
it automatically implies the end of a measure at that point.
I can think of
Hi David,
I recall thinking at some point that perhaps LilyPond would count up the
stuff not between \cadenzaOn ... \cadenzaOff and place barlines in the
correct place (it doesn't).
What do you mean here differing from 1) (which is what I also proposed
in a previous mail)? I don't
- Original Message -
From: Noeck noeck.marb...@gmx.de
To: bobr...@centrum.is
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 7:53:58 PM
Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
Hi David,
I recall thinking at some point that perhaps LilyPond would count up
- Original Message -
From: Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net
To: Lilypond User List lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 12:14:36 PM
Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
At 10:49 on 28 Mar 2015, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew
At 10:49 on 28 Mar 2015, bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com
Yes, I have accidentals in the cadenza section. As I stated, however,
in the final measure the cadenza has been ended and a bar line has
been crossed so the key signature
Hi David,
how about this:
\version 2.18.2
\score {
\relative c' {
\clef F
\key a \major
r4-\fermata cis4 ~
cis8.-[ \grace { dis32 cis bis cis } dis!16-] \cadenzaOn e4 ~
\teeny
\stemUp
e32-[ dis e dis-] \cadenzaOff cis-[ bis! c b-] a-[ gis a gis-]
%% 4/4 measure
A naive question: Could the \cadenzaOff command be changed in a way that
it automatically implies the end of a measure at that point. Perhaps I
overlook cases where this is not wanted, but where I use this command, I
want a bar line and a new bar starting with beat one right after it.
Any
I provided a bad example in my previous attempt in an effort to be minimal.
Here goes with one that actually illustrates the issue:
I ran into some seemingly odd output when using \cadenzaOn and \cadenzaOff.
According to this:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com
To: bobr...@centrum.is, Lillypond Users Mailing List lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:23:40 AM
Subject: Re: cadenza_and_accidentals-take2
Well, you have a C natural in the group of 32s
Well, you have a C natural in the group of 32s, and then in the last bar a C#,
so generally engravers will put a sharp to revert the previous natural and let
the performer know we are back to normal (cadenza or not). That’s how I learned
music (I think!).
Also, when putting manual beaming, you
12 matches
Mail list logo
