Re: edition-editor usage

Mason Hock: > Urs Liska: >> >> Actually I do not see why any of this should be incompatible. Both >> page-layout and partial-compilation *use* the EE. Maybe it is a naming >> conflict somehow. > > Here's a reduced example of what I have. Can you spot what I'm doing wrong? > > \version

Re: edition-editor usage

Urs Liska: > > > Am 27. Dezember 2017 18:32:00 MEZ schrieb Mason Hock : >>> I usually use the EE to >>> set the needed breaks: >>> \editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17 >> >> Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that

Re: edition-editor usage

Am 27. Dezember 2017 18:32:00 MEZ schrieb Mason Hock : >>I usually use the EE to >>set the needed breaks: >>\editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17 > >Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that partial-complication >relied on the break

Re: edition-editor usage

>I usually use the EE to >set the needed breaks: >\editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17 Thanks, Jan-Peter. This works well, except that partial-complication relied on the break sets defined with page-layout.conditional-breaks. Do you know if it is possible for

Re: edition-editor usage

Hi Mason, I'll have to try if both modules are compatible. I usually use the EE to set the needed breaks: \editionModList breaksForTargetX sing.with.bach.Score \break 5,9,13,17 But both solutions shall not compete and I'll have a look into it in January ;-) Best Jan-Peter Am 26.12.2017 um

Re: edition-editor usage

Thanks for clarifying, Jan-Peter. I think the point I was most confused on was the x.y.z notation, but you response helped a lot. I now have edition engraver working with \addEdition violinI-letter \editionMod violinI-letter 9 0/8 score.violinI.Voice \once \shapeII #'(()()(p 110 .6)()) Slur

Re: OLL-core and Win10 [was Re: edition-editor usage]

as what I might be doing wrong? >> >> Trevor >> >> -- Original Message ------ >> From: "Jan-Peter Voigt" <jp.vo...@gmx.de <mailto:jp.vo...@gmx.de>> >> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>; "Mason >Hock&q

OLL-core and Win10 [was Re: edition-editor usage]

<mailto:masonh...@gmail.com>> Sent: 24/12/2017 10:19:48 Subject: Re: edition-editor usage Hello Mason, it is possible to use \shapeII with the edition-engraver :-) And it sounds like this is the use case the EE is originally meant for. Yes, the wording is a bit inconsistent and/or irrit

Re[2]: edition-editor usage

doing wrong? Trevor -- Original Message -- From: "Jan-Peter Voigt" <jp.vo...@gmx.de> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; "Mason Hock" <masonh...@gmail.com> Sent: 24/12/2017 10:19:48 Subject: Re: edition-editor usage Hello Mason, it is possible to use \shapeII with

Re: edition-editor usage

Hello Mason, it is possible to use \shapeII with the edition-engraver :-) And it sounds like this is the use case the EE is originally meant for. Yes, the wording is a bit inconsistent and/or irritating. I will try to sum it up: In the recent versions I used the terms target and context to

edition-editor usage

I have a piece in which each performer reads from a version of the score with their staff full-sized with the other parts on small staves. This pieces also requires a lot of manual tweaking of slurs. I've been using \shapeII for the slurs, which works great, except that if I shape the slur