Hi Andrew,
I'll put up a MR to add the improved \shape to lilypond proper, as
soon as I find the time to do so.
At least it will be an improvement.
Though, I did not look into shapeII, maybe it could be improved similarly?
Cheers,
Harm
Am Mo., 12. Okt. 2020 um 09:55 Uhr schrieb Andrew Bernard
Stay tuned, and will add the improvement to the OLL repository, once I
have it all set up.
Andrew
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 17:44, Martín Rincón Botero
wrote:
>
>
> I have to run more tests, but your \shape-h function is simply excellent.
> Thank you! I wish this could be the default behavior of a
Dear Harm,
I have to run more tests, but your \shape-h function is simply excellent. Thank
you! I wish this could be the default behavior of a new \reshape function.
Perhaps the open issue shouldn’t be fixed for \shape: that way the folks who
carefully used small values for small staves to fix
Dear Thomas,
sorry for not having provided examples myself of what doesn’t scale. I haven’t
had the time for that yet. However, your explanation seems to be right. I
definitely have to use smaller values for smaller font sizes. I was planning to
collect a few examples from the viola concerto I’
Am Mi., 7. Okt. 2020 um 10:35 Uhr schrieb Martín Rincón Botero
:
>
> Now that we’ve been talking about \shape and \shapeII, I would like to ask if
> it’s possible that values put for \shape(II) could scale according to staff
> size. Whenever I have a smaller staff, whatever values work for a 20 p
Le 07/10/2020 à 19:50, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 07/10/2020 à 18:58, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with
Lilypond 2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either.
I’m already kinda “used” to writing
Le 07/10/2020 à 18:58, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with
Lilypond 2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either.
I’m already kinda “used” to writing smaller values —my primitive math
only cooperated
Hello Jean,
thanks for further exploring the first request. In my experience with Lilypond
2.20 \shape doesn’t scale with set-global-staff-size either. I’m already kinda
“used” to writing smaller values —my primitive math only cooperated with me
today to figure that I can use fractions to easil
Now that we’ve been talking about \shape and \shapeII, I would like to
ask if it’s possible that values put for \shape(II) could scale
according to staff size. Whenever I have a smaller staff, whatever
values work for a 20 points staff are too much for smaller staves
(either with a smaller font
Now that we’ve been talking about \shape and \shapeII, I would like to ask if
it’s possible that values put for \shape(II) could scale according to staff
size. Whenever I have a smaller staff, whatever values work for a 20 points
staff are too much for smaller staves (either with a smaller font
10 matches
Mail list logo
