See attached. Overriding the fingering font works fine for fingering
attached to a note but is ignored when using \finger in a markup, where
the default fingering font is still used.
\version 2.15.37
\relative c'' {
\override Staff.Fingering #'font-name = #'Arial Black
e-44 cis d\prall
Nick
On 19 March 2012 05:19, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
In a chord with two accidentals, if I set the fingering script-priority to
-99, the fingerings still avoid both accidentals, but if I set it to -100,
each fingering indication is positioned without regard
In a chord with two accidentals, if I set the fingering script-priority
to -99, the fingerings still avoid both accidentals, but if I set it to
-100, each fingering indication is positioned without regard to the
accidental on the other note. Is this related to
https://code.google.com/p
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
On 05/01/12 07:58, Nick Payne wrote:
See below. If the note with the accidental appears first in the chord,
then the fingering for the other note correctly avoids the accidental. If
the order of the notes
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.netwrote:
See below. If the note with the accidental appears first in the chord,
then the fingering for the other note correctly avoids the accidental. If
the order of the notes is reversed, the fingering collides
See below. If the note with the accidental appears first in the chord,
then the fingering for the other note correctly avoids the accidental.
If the order of the notes is reversed, the fingering collides with the
accidental. I don't know if this is related to issue 1222
(http://code.google.com
On 05/01/12 07:58, Nick Payne wrote:
See below. If the note with the accidental appears first in the chord,
then the fingering for the other note correctly avoids the accidental.
If the order of the notes is reversed, the fingering collides with the
accidental. I don't know if this is related
James-379 wrote:
I get warnings about using fingering
numbers 5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles.
I love it: it works for me, cannot reproduce ;) . Whatever, in general
approach, warning=error. What would be a legitimate way to visually get the
same output as a fingering
Hello,
On 31 December 2011 14:13, gajatko gaja...@gmail.com wrote:
James-379 wrote:
I get warnings about using fingering
numbers 5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles.
I love it: it works for me, cannot reproduce ;) .
Err... if you _read_ what I wrote and not just paraphrase me
gajatko wrote:
in future I will also need numbers like 9,11,13 etc.
Check out LSR 756
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=756
and some context
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-03/msg00138.html
Cheers,
Robin
___
for fingerings larger than 5
\override Fingering #'text = #calc-finger-without-warning
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(right)
c1\ten
c1\fifty
c1-\finger #36
c1-\finger #29
}
Greetings
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lilypond-hangs-on-a-script-after-adding-fingering
override to remove warnings for fingerings larger than 5
\override Fingering #'text = #calc-finger-without-warning
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(right)
c1\ten
c1\fifty
c1-\finger #36
c1-\finger #29
}
Greetings
View this message in context: Re
Hi,
2011/12/27 gajatko gaja...@gmail.com:
Hello!
I am not sure which statement spoils the process, but the following script
causes Lilypond.exe to hang without any output (I waited 100 seconds).
\version 2.12.3
[...]
\chords {
\germanChords
\set chordNameLowercaseMinor = ##t
[...]
}
:3.6.7.3
fis2:1.3.5.1
ais4:5.1.3-.7-
fis4:1.5.5.3
b4:5.7-.3-.1
b2:4.7-.3-.1
c4:3.5.2.1
cis4:3-.5.2-.1
a1:1.1.3.1
}
\score {
lt;lt;
\treble
\bass
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
The problem began to occur after adding information about fingering (which I
use for different purpose here
tried this on latest stable (2.14.2)
and it didn't cause any hang - I get warnings about using fingering
numbers 5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles.
Is it possible to use the latest stable version please and see if you
get the same problem?
if there is a problem in 2.12.x
This is perfect!
-\tweak #'text #(markup 3 - 4)-0
It is exactly what I've searched for: A drop in replacement for a simple
fingering.
Nils
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:21:23 +0100
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Nils,
2011/12/14 Nils l...@nilsgey.de:
Hello,
I want
On 14 December 2011 08:49, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
Hello,
I want to have a fingering change on a chord note. And I mean a real
chordnote, not a second voice.
c -2 e -3|4
The manual gives only the markup method which does, AFAIK, not work on
chord members.
Then use a \markup outside
Nils Hammerfest wrote:
I want to have a fingering change on a chord note. And I mean a real
chordnote, not a second voice.
c -2 e -3|4
The manual gives only the markup method which does, AFAIK, not work on
chord members.
However complex, I don't care. I am only concerned about
Hi Nils,
2011/12/14 Nils l...@nilsgey.de:
Hello,
I want to have a fingering change on a chord note. And I mean a real
chordnote, not a second voice.
c -2 e -3|4
The manual gives only the markup method which does, AFAIK, not work on
chord members.
However complex, I don't care. I am only
Hello,
I want to have a fingering change on a chord note. And I mean a real
chordnote, not a second voice.
c -2 e -3|4
The manual gives only the markup method which does, AFAIK, not work on
chord members.
However complex, I don't care. I am only concerned about the end result.
Related:
How
Nick Payne-3 wrote:
Is this a bug or expected behaviour? Here I am overriding the fingering
font, but when I use \finger inside a markup, I still get the default
fingering font rather than the font I've selected, unless I issue a
separate font override inside the markup:
since you use
Is this a bug or expected behaviour? Here I am overriding the fingering
font, but when I use \finger inside a markup, I still get the default
fingering font rather than the font I've selected, unless I issue a
separate font override inside the markup:
\version 2.15.20
\relative c
Hi Colin,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Further Googling gives
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/**Snippet?id=616http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=616
which is closer in appearance, but I haven't the Scheme fu to modify the
stringNumberSpanner function
On 11-10-31 08:33 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Colin,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca
mailto:c...@shaw.ca wrote:
Further Googling gives http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=616
which is closer in appearance, but I haven't the Scheme fu to
modify the
Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f))
}
\score {
\celloII
\layout {}
}
%%
Surely I'm missing something less brutal than that! My instructor
wants to make the held fingering explicit in many, many bars, and as
long as he's waving the pencil, I'm unconcerned. When
{
\celloII
\layout {}
}
%%
Surely I'm missing something less brutal than that! My instructor wants
to make the held fingering explicit in many, many bars, and as long as
he's waving the pencil, I'm unconcerned. When I'm running the exercise
through LP to get
Crist,
you forgot to attach a file. Did you compile my code as it is or did you insert
it in a larger .ly-file? In the latter case just post it and I'll have a look
at it.
patrick
Am 17.09.2011 um 06:12 schrieb Crist Khachikian:
Patrick,
I inserted your code directly into my lilypond
I compiled your snippet and everything looks fine (see file attached). So the
problem must be somewhere else in your score. You will have to comment out
parts of your code to narrow down the problem (see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/usage/troubleshooting)
hth
patrick
inline:
I am having trouble with fingering notes that have other things going
on (e.g., a staccato note, a tied note, etc.). The only way I have
figured out how to do this is by using this notation (for a staccato
note):
c-.^\markup{\finger 2}
any other notation (e.g., c-.-1 or c\staccato-1 or other
Crist,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Crist Khachikian ckhachik...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having trouble with fingering notes that have other things going
on (e.g., a staccato note, a tied note, etc.). The only way I have
figured out how to do this is by using this notation (for a staccato
I can't reproduce any error. Your problems have got nothing to do with jEdit. I
checked it with jEdit v4.3.2. All of the above-mentioned solutions are fine:
\version 2.14.2
{
a-1-. b-2-- c'-3-^ d'-4-.
a-.-1 b---2 c'-^-3 d'-.-4
c'-.-1 c'\staccato-1
}
inline: double-fingering.png
Which
What about for notes with stems pointing down? That's where I have the problem
(sorry for being unclear)
Thanks
Crist
On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
I can't reproduce any error. Your problems have got nothing to do with jEdit.
I checked it with
Am 16.09.2011 um 18:44 schrieb Crist Khachikian:
What about for notes with stems pointing down? That's where I have the
problem (sorry for being unclear)
No problems here!
\version 2.14.2
{
\stemDown
a-1-. b-2-- c'-3-^ d'-4-.
a-.-1 b---2 c'-^-3 d'-.-4
c'-.-1 c'\staccato-1
}
Patrick,
I inserted your code directly into my lilypond file. Here is what I have:
Here is the output
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 16.09.2011 um 18:44 schrieb Crist Khachikian:
What about for notes with stems pointing down? That's where I
Dominicus wrote:
Thanks Reinhold!
I'll continue to wonder why Lilypond requires explicit override statement
to reposition fingerings on a second voice:
\once\override Fingering #'direction = #UP b-3
instead of interpreting the single voice notation b^3 should be explicit
enough
Am Saturday, 3. September 2011, 23:34:11 schrieb Javier Ruiz-Alma:
\version 2.14.2
%looking for a way to place fingering at top but under the slur
\score{
\new Staff
{a''2.^( b''4^)}
\\ {s2 b'8^\markup{\finger 3}( g') s4}
\layout {}
}
From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Sent: Saturday
\version 2.14.2
%looking for a way to place fingering at top but under the slur
\score{
\new Staff
{a''2.^( b''4^)}
\\ {s2 b'8^\markup{\finger 3}( g') s4}
\layout {}
}
attachment: Finger_Under_Tie.gif___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond
Am Saturday, 3. September 2011, 23:34:11 schrieb Javier Ruiz-Alma:
\version 2.14.2
%looking for a way to place fingering at top but under the slur
\score{
\new Staff
{a''2.^( b''4^)}
\\ {s2 b'8^\markup{\finger 3}( g') s4}
\layout {}
}
If you use a real fingering, you can
Dominicus wrote:
\version 2.14.2
%looking for a way to place fingering at top but under the slur
\score{
\new Staff
{a''2.^( b''4^)}
\\ {s2 b'8^\markup{\finger 3}( g') s4}
\layout {}
}
Or use real fingerings with \set fingeringOrientations.
\version 2.14.2
%looking
Am Saturday, 3. September 2011, 23:34:11 schrieb Javier Ruiz-Alma:
\version 2.14.2
%looking for a way to place fingering at top but under the slur
\score{
\new Staff
{a''2.^( b''4^)}
\\ {s2 b'8^\markup{\finger 3}( g') s4}
\layout {}
}
From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Sent: Saturday
Hello,
When a chord contains an interval of second, note heads are shifted and
fingerings follow but this is not pretty for strings instruments where
fingerings are usually (horizontally) aligned (and placed on top of the notes).
I know I could tweak each fingering for second chords as:
http
See below. As soon as I add strokefingering to the chord, it affects the
position of the fingering indication for the B. I don't have a previous
version of LP installed to test against, but this behaviour has changed
somewhere along the line, as the actual score I was working on looks
fine
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35 AM
Subject: Fingering positioning problem 2.13.61
See below. As soon as I add strokefingering to the chord, it affects the
position
On 27/05/11 21:17, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Payne
nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35 AM
Subject: Fingering positioning problem 2.13.61
See below. As soon as I add strokefingering
In this snippet the triplet line collides with the fingering.
\version 2.13.60
\language english
Violin = \relative d'' {
\times 2/3{d4 a8-4}
}
\score {
\new Staff { \Violin }
\layout {}
}
inline: PastedGraphic-2.png
I know i could use \once \override TupletBracket #'direction = #DOWN
On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Marc Mouries wrote:
In this snippet the triplet line collides with the fingering.
\version 2.13.60
\language english
Violin = \relative d'' {
\times 2/3{d4 a8-4}
}
\score {
\new Staff { \Violin }
\layout {}
}
PastedGraphic-2.png
I know i could
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marc Mouries m...@mouries.net wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Marc Mouries wrote:
In this snippet the triplet line collides with the fingering.
\version 2.13.60
\language english
Violin = \relative d'' {
\times 2/3{d4 a8-4}
}
\score
On Apr 3, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation
as shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond seems to
always
From: m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com
To: Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com
Sent: Mon, April 4, 2011 2:25:58 PM
Subject: Re: Trill notation with fingering
On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier
On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation
as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond seems to
always try to display the tr symbol at the very top, no matter
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond seems
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond seems
On 04/04/11 09:31, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering
notiation as shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond
seems to always try to display
On Apr 3, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Javier Ruiz-Alma wrote:
Any ideas as to how best to approximate the trill plus fingering notiation as
shown in this image?
The closest I can get is:
a2.\trill^markup{\finger 3 2}
However, this doesn't show the cap over the digits, plus lilypond seems to
always try
Thank You for the pointers Kieren and Robin,
Concatenating fingering commands to show alternate fingerings worked like a
charm (i.e. c8-2-3 ). Thank You!
On the passages that had incomplete last bars, I tried \cadenzaOn and
\partial. These worked to override the automatic bar generator
Hi Javier,
Is there a way to trigger lilypond to arbitrarily reset its bar counter
mid-staff?
You can use \partial.
You could use skip notes.
You could also make the last note take up the remaining amount (e.g., c4*3).
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
Javier Ruiz wrote:
just adding [\bar |.] doesn't reset lilypond's automatic bar generator.
You can use \cadenzaOn to turn off the bar generator.
a set of alternate fingering digits stacked vertically.
Lilypond doen't object to you asking for two fingers on one note.
If that is too
On 9 March 2011 23:18, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
If this is true I can add an @knownissue in the Notation Reference at
least. Unless anyone objects?
It's only true at the most basic level, i.e., using the bare digits,
since this is a parser limitation. However, there's nothing
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com]
)Sent: 10 March 2011 18:09
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: Robin Bannister; banners...@ccacompanies.com; LilyPond User
)Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
)
)On 9 March 2011 23:18, James Lowe james.l
On 10 March 2011 18:18, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
We could add this snippet to the LSR and then add an @known, or (someone)
make a code change to allow any digit to be generated (i.e. we use 0 - 9 but
let users have multiple instances of 0 - 9 so you can get 'fingering
hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com]
)Sent: 10 March 2011 18:23
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: LilyPond User
)Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
)
)On 10 March 2011 18:18, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
)wrote:
)
) We could add this snippet
On 10 March 2011 18:52, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
I've added a snippet for approval.
Great, thanks!
I've made a few style/coding tweaks (including an override to suppress
annoying warning messages for those who like clean compilation) and
tagged/approved it.
Cheers,
Neil
Neil,
-Original Message-
From: Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:04:31 +
To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Cc: LilyPond User lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
On 10 March 2011 18:52, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
This is hardcoded. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/msg00691.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello
-Original Message-
From: Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:07 +0100
To: banners...@ccacompanies.com, LilyPond User lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Double Digit Fingering ie 10 11 12
This is hardcoded. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user
It appears that double digit fingering is not supported in the shorthand
version:
f-10\3-\RH #2 %error: syntax error, unexpected UNSIGNED
I found a reference to using \markup as the long hand and a previous post
referencing -\markup { \finger . . . } and ^\markup { \finger . . . }
So I tried
How do you move a fingering that is on the stem side closer to the notehead,
and thus next to the stem instead of outside it? (See the image and
snippet.) While looking around for a solution, I have tried all sorts of
things: Y-offset, padding, staff-padding, add-stem-support,
outside-staff
On 01/03/11 07:22, Mus Felix wrote:
How do you move a fingering that is on the stem side closer to the
notehead, and thus next to the stem instead of outside it? (See the
image and snippet.) While looking around for a solution, I have tried
all sorts of things: Y-offset, padding, staff
On 24 February 2011 02:00, MusFelix musfe...@live.com wrote:
How do I set the font used in the measure numbers at the beginning of each
system to use the number fonts used in fingerings?
\override Score.BarNumber #'font-encoding = #'fetaText
seems to do the trick.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier
How do I set the font used in the measure numbers at the beginning of each
system to use the number fonts used in fingerings?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Fingering-font-in-Measure-numbers-tp31000348p31000348.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing
On 24/02/11 12:00, MusFelix wrote:
How do I set the font used in the measure numbers at the beginning of each
system to use the number fonts used in fingerings?
You can get them pretty much exactly the same size and weight with the
following, but the digits are still not the same shape:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Ben Finney bignose+hates-s...@benfinney.id.au writes:
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L”
and “R” as fingers.
Use \L and \R instead.
L=-\tweak #'Fingering #'text L-1
R=-\tweak #'Fignering #'text R-1
That causes my
Ben Finney ben+lilyp...@benfinney.id.au writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Ben Finney bignose+hates-s...@benfinney.id.au writes:
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L”
and “R” as fingers.
[...]
R=
[...]
That causes my LilyPond to complain
Ben Finney ben+lilyp...@benfinney.id.au writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
LL=-\tweak #'text #L-1
RR=-\tweak #'text #R-1
{ c c8 c8-\RR c8-\LL^Ben's favourite note c8-\RR- }
This works reasonably well, but it also greatly increases the space
between systems. Why would that be?
Oops, this was sent with too little editing, sorry.
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Ben Finney bignose+hates-s...@benfinney.id.au writes:
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L” and
“R” as fingers.
Use \L and \R instead.
L=-\tweak #'Fingering #'text L-1
R
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Oops, this was sent with too little editing, sorry.
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Ben Finney bignose+hates-s...@benfinney.id.au writes:
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L” and
“R” as fingers.
Use \L and \R
Ben Finney ben+lilyp...@benfinney.id.au writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Oops, this was sent with too little editing, sorry.
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Ben Finney bignose+hates-s...@benfinney.id.au writes:
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support
and thank you for getting me that far!
But I'm eager to use the tweak to Fingering that you're hinting at,
because I think that's the correct feature to use (and it means the
correct markup will be used by default).
--
\ “Computer perspective on Moore's Law: Human effort becomes
, since the note cannot then have both “sticking”
and an arbitrary annotation.
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L” and
“R” as fingers.
Use \L and \R instead.
L=-\tweak #'Fingering #'text L-1
R=-\tweak #'Fignering #'text R-1
As the earlier discussion pointed
”
and an arbitrary annotation.
What would be better is for the “fingering” feature to support “L” and
“R” as fingers.
As the earlier discussion pointed out in a message from Levi Hendricks:
Also, sticking is just as important for a percussionist as fingering
is for piano player. I understand how
c4^999? This won't work e f c^9994
Shane
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:20 PM, lunar7 lun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks James,
The fingering markup works great for single notes (regular non-markup
makes
numbers a tad too big). But I seem to get an error for noteheads within
chords cannot
could be c, but also a bis or
deses). If a user wants to toggle between options, to do this I want to
initially markup the notes with index numbers using fingering markup for
an unintended purpose. To my amazement, without overriding the fingering
markup command accepts numbers up to 9, but anything two
a note given
its MIDI pitch (i.e. note number 60 could be c, but also a bis or deses). If
a user wants to toggle between options, to do this I want to initially markup
the notes with index numbers using fingering markup for an unintended
purpose. To my amazement, without overriding
Thanks James,
The fingering markup works great for single notes (regular non-markup makes
numbers a tad too big). But I seem to get an error for noteheads within
chords cannot add text scripts to individual note heads.
Anyone know of a way around this?
Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:15 AM
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version 2.13.43
\new Staff { \relative c''' {
\override OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #20
\override OttavaBracket #'staff-padding = #60
\override OttavaBracket #'y-offset = #60
On 18 December 2010 11:42, Orm Finnendahl
o.finnend...@inm.mh-freiburg.de wrote:
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version 2.13.43
\new Staff { \relative c''' {
\override OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #20
- Original Message -
From: Orm Finnendahl o.finnend...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: ottava bracket and fingering
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version
On 18/12/10 22:32, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Orm Finnendahl
o.finnend...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: ottava bracket and fingering
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes:
On 18/12/10 22:32, Phil Holmes wrote:
The OttavaBracket is a part of the Staff context, and music is in
the voice context - so you need:
Staff.OttavaBracket
If OttavaBracket doesn't exist in the Voice context, shouldn't an
error be generated
Hi,
2010/12/18 Orm Finnendahl o.finnend...@inm.mh-freiburg.de:
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version 2.13.43
\new Staff { \relative c''' {
\override OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #20
\override OttavaBracket
Lilypond (http://www.lilypond.org) has automated woodwind fingering charts
as of version 2.13 for the following instruments:
Piccolo
Flute
Oboe
Clarinet
Bass clarinet
Saxophone
Bassoon
Contrabassoon
To get the attached result, compile the following snippet of code with
Lilypond:
\version
Hi,
How can I make this (a piano lefthand chord with fingering below the
staff) look better:
\relative c' { b_5 f'_2 g_11 }
I want the 5-2-1 vertically aligned below the b and the f,
Now the 2 is alligned with the f in the chord.
--
Martin Tarenskeen
:
Hi,
How can I make this (a piano lefthand chord with fingering below the
staff) look better:
\relative c' { b_5 f'_2 g_11 }
I want the 5-2-1 vertically aligned below the b and the f,
Now the 2 is alligned with the f in the chord.
--
Martin Tarenskeen
On 15/09/10 18:19, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
How can I make this (a piano lefthand chord with fingering below the
staff) look better:
\relative c' { b_5 f'_2 g_11 }
I want the 5-2-1 vertically aligned below the b and the f,
Now the 2 is alligned with the f in the chord.
You could use
Hi,
How can I make this (a piano lefthand chord with fingering below the
staff) look better:
\relative c' { b_5 f'_2 g_11 }
You could use tweak:
\relative c' {
b_5 f')_2 g-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(-1.8 . 0)_11
}
I think this does precisely what you want, unless you want to further
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Vicente Solsona wrote:
How can I make this (a piano lefthand chord with fingering below the
staff) look better:
\relative c' { b_5 f'_2 g_11 }
You could use tweak:
\relative c' {
b_5 f')_2 g-\tweak #'extra-offset #'(-1.8 . 0)_11
}
\relative c' { b f' g1_1_2_5
Is this a bug or a known problem or how things are supposed to work? If
the fingering for the C# is to the left, then the fingering for the A
automatically avoids the accidental. if the fingering for the C# is
above the note, whether placed by using ^ or with a \set command, then
the fingering
On Mon 16 Aug 2010, 17:19 Nick Payne wrote:
Is this a bug or a known problem or how things are supposed to work?
If the fingering for the C# is to the left, then the fingering for
the A automatically avoids the accidental. if the fingering for the
C# is above the note, whether placed by using
601 - 700 of 1060 matches
Mail list logo
