What do you think about talking out the score in lilypond style..so you
wouldnt have to switch eyes between screen and sheet..for example..:
c 8 f 16 c 4 . ( d 8 d d |
and than a script to fix it:
c8 f16 c4. ( d8 d d |
but i think that voice recognition is not well suported on linux..i think
yo
On 26 May 2012 03:28, Klaus Föhl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
> Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
> that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
> if one does not have a typing
On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:28:02 + (UTC)
Klaus Föhl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
> Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
> that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
> if one doe
Klaus Föhl writes:
>> midi2ly, obviously. It sucks royally for human-created input. Look up
>> Viterbi decoders and/or hidden Markov chains for a plan how to do better.
>
> So far I have mentally broken down the task into two main chunks:
> 1) establish the maths function/relation recording tim
> midi2ly, obviously. It sucks royally for human-created input. Look up
> Viterbi decoders and/or hidden Markov chains for a plan how to do better.
So far I have mentally broken down the task into two main chunks:
1) establish the maths function/relation recording time versus music piece time
2)
Am 26.05.2012 18:46, schrieb David Kastrup:
Andrew Hawryluk writes:
Maybe someday the computer will be able to see or hear the music in my
head and type it out ... no, scratch that. Mind-reading computers
doesn't sounds like a good idea at all: we're trying to keep the
humans in charge of this
Andrew Hawryluk writes:
> Maybe someday the computer will be able to see or hear the music in my
> head and type it out ... no, scratch that. Mind-reading computers
> doesn't sounds like a good idea at all: we're trying to keep the
> humans in charge of this place, after all!
I have no problems
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Klaus Föhl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
> Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
> that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
> if one does not hav
> From: Klaus Föhl
> I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
> Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
> that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
> if one does not have a typing c4 d e f g1 style but c4 d4. e8
Klaus Föhl writes:
> Hello,
>
> I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
> Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
> that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
> if one does not have a typing c4 d e f g1 style but
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
if one does not have a typing c4 d e f g1 style but c4 d4. e8 f8. g16 c,1
What "be
11 matches
Mail list logo