Thanks to all for the replies. An approach using chord structure would seem
difficult, since the voices are not kept separate. The \\ and { }
\\ {} structures should work, but don't seem very elegant compared to
writing separate voices. After some initial discussion with someone in the
On 1/18/10 2:24 AM, mike99 mike.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Carl's method of using partcombine allows for keeping the voice inputs
separate. This makes the code clearer, and is encouraging since it's still
undecided which notation to adopt; by changing a few declarations I could
use either
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote:
I set printPartCombineTexts to #f. I have just lived with it. But given
your experience with chords, I decided to try putting a chord with a
transparent note in the voice that needed the extra stem:
soprano = \relative c'' {
a f e d |
e g c b
}
alto
mike99 mike.brigu at gmail.com writes:
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote:
This does work, though I found another limitation. Because you have to place
the note head about one staff space down in order to avoid horizontal
displacement of the phantom note head, the stem protrudes further down (or
Graham Percival wrote:
The non-translates docs are 2137 pages. Not a typo; we have over
two thousand pages. (granted, that counts table of contents,
index, LSR extracts, etc... but it's still a lot!)
Not to mention the auto-generated IR which repeats the same information
over and over
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:30:19 -0800 (PST),
mike99 mike.br...@gmail.com a écrit :
Fair enough, but there are the lyrics, set here to the soprano voice,
which, unintended by myself, skips the fourth beat in the second
measure. In the documentation's first example on divisi
Hi Bertalan,
Are you sure? I think I remember that
{ c } \\ { d }
Will make the c to be in a Voice called a, so
\context Voice = a { e { c } \\ { d } }
will make the e and c in the same voice.
I believe it's 1.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
Why not spend a minute to find an authoritative answer before sending
speculations to the list?
See for example Sect. 3.2.2 Explicitly instantiating voices of the
Learning Manual or examples like
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg38804.html
/Mats
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Mats,
Why not spend a minute to find an authoritative answer before sending
speculations to the list?
You're right — I'm just not going to bother answering such questions any more.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Why not spend a minute to find an authoritative answer before sending
speculations to the list?
Because my memory works like a hash map, so I can find data in it
constant time, while looking in the manual or the archive is in O(nlogn)
where n is the size of the information source.
Bert
See
2010/1/8 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu:
Why not spend a minute to find an authoritative answer before sending
speculations to the list?
Because my memory works like a hash map, so I can find data in it constant
time, while looking in the manual or the archive is in
On 1/7/10 3:40 PM, pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au
wrote:
See, e.g., To God be the Glory,
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=195
which has the words to the refrain set, but not the other words.
(BTW, the spacing algorithm changed after I first typeset
Le Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:30:19 -0800 (PST),
mike99 mike.br...@gmail.com a écrit :
Fair enough, but there are the lyrics, set here to the soprano voice,
which, unintended by myself, skips the fourth beat in the second
measure. In the documentation's first example on divisi lyrics
(Notation
On 02.01.2010, at 16:20, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
If such a technique is required for all exceptions to the chord
structure, it seems as if the chord method could become patchwork
if many exceptions are needed in a piece. Ten exceptions might be
common on a one-page hymn, requiring the creation of
On 1/1/10 6:30 PM, mike99 mike.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Enter my question: What is your opinion to the two methods, given the
direction of the project and in terms of readability and complications that
it would cause in the score? It would not be a simple thing to switch
between the two
Greetings,
After a few days of reading and coding, I'm entering the steep part of the
learning curve as a new user. Years ago I used MusiXTeX with pmx and M-tx,
and the different is appreciable. I'm gearing up for a song-book project,
and it looks like LP will win out over MuseScore and any
16 matches
Mail list logo
