On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
By and large, the project is already providing what FreeBSD
LilyPond users want and need: a good product, built from clean,
open source code which is highly portable to run on a variety of
platforms. Well done, all of you.
Hi
Hello,
Von: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Technical reasons? not many. Cultural reasons? they don't like
binaries.
Actually, there are two significant technical reasons: the official FreeBSD
packages are usually
a bit behind on updates, and if you're running an older version of
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
By and large, the project is already providing what FreeBSD
LilyPond users want and need: a good product, built from clean,
open source code which is highly
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
What makes it different from
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes:
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
prefer your ad-hoc port over the official distribution for FreeBSD?
What version of
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:15:39PM -0800, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
This port provides a minimal framework compatible with the
FreeBSD ports system which permits any ports-enabled BSD system
to use standard BSD management tools (portupgrade, pkg_delete,
etc.) to build, package, install,
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
prefer your ad-hoc port over the official distribution for
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
port). Given that a call for testers was made recently, I
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
port). Given
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
So what is the difference as compared to the version on the LilyPond
download page? What makes the download for FreeBSD that we offer less
desirable?
I am only one person, and I cannot make global, objective
statements about
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:08:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Remember: I don't use FreeBSD. Only you can answer this question and
thus tell us in what way what we are offering currently is a waste of
time and effort.
Nah, I can answer the question. :)
Relax. He's being a nice
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
To install it, you should first de-install any previously
existing version of lilypond.
Then, as root:
# cd /usr/ports
# tar xvf
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
What makes it different from http://lilypond.org/unix.html#Download-3 ?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/3/10 lilyp...@umpquanet.com:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
What makes it different from
I must correct my omission of acknowledging the help of Pietro
Cerutti in creating this port. His expertise and assistance is
greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:40:20PM -0800, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may
18 matches
Mail list logo
