Thank you very much.
Did as you wrote and it works perfectley.
regards Marcel.
2006/12/27, Kim Shrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Dec 27, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Marcel Campenhout wrote:
> After installing lilypond 2.10.5 freebsd-x86
> I get this,
> "/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 :shared object lidm.so.2
Karl Hammar aspodata.se> writes:
>
> > After installing lilypond 2.10.5 freebsd-x86
> > I get this,
> > "/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 :shared object lidm.so.2 not found required by
> > lilypond".
>
> Are you sure it said "lidm" and not "libm"?
>
> > What can I do next to get it working?
>
> I wou
> After installing lilypond 2.10.5 freebsd-x86
> I get this,
> "/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 :shared object lidm.so.2 not found required by
> lilypond".
Are you sure it said "lidm" and not "libm"?
> What can I do next to get it working?
I would try ldd, like:
$ ldd /usr/bin/lilypond
libdl.s
After installing lilypond 2.10.5 freebsd-x86
I get this,
"/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 :shared object lidm.so.2 not found required by
lilypond".
I made a sym.link from de libm.so.3 -- libm.so.2.
placed one in /usr/lib and one in /usr/libexec but the
result is the same error.
What can I do next to g
ussion of a lilypond port for freebsd,
but I can't
see any updates about this.
In addition, it's a good idea to give your question a descriptive
subject (like
"lilypond on freebsd", which I've done). This way somebody who only
reads
lilypond-user casually will be able to tel
Zbyněk Burget writes:
> In "Linux world" maybe nobody compile sw from sourcecode, if is
> available binary package, in "FreeBSD world" is compilation from
> sourcecode routine...
That's why I do not understand that you want to build some parts from
source (the C files) and other parts not (the .m
Zbyněk Burget writes:
> O.K. - I shall write to mailing list...
Thanks!
> I try compile lilypond 2.6.3 on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE.
> To save time of compilation, I've decidet on use "make -C mf get-pfa"
> Entire compilation process pass O.K. (it seemed), but through install
> process I get error:
>
>
Hi,
O.K. - I shall write to mailing list...
I try compile lilypond 2.6.3 on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE.
To save time of compilation, I've decidet on use "make -C mf get-pfa"
Entire compilation process pass O.K. (it seemed), but through install
process I get error:
/home/zburget/make/lilypond-2.6.3/st
Zbyněk Burget writes:
> some time ago I was communicate directly with you - I thought that my
> mail is off-topic for mailing list - my question was I intended as
> platform dependent and technical info...
No problem, but anything technical and lilypond-related is on-topic on
the mailing list.
>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen napsal(a):
> Please, use the mailing list for non-personal email.
> Jan.
I'm sorry, if I send mail to wrong recipient :-(
some time ago I was communicate directly with you - I thought that my
mail is off-topic for mailing list - my question was I intended as
platform depende
Gordon Gilbert writes:
> The latest version for ports is stil 2.2.2. Any ideas on when the
> newer version might be built and put in ports?
The LilyPond download page lists Patrick Atamaniuk as FreeBSD
maintainer. You may want to contact him about this.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROT
Hi!
I've been using 2.2.2 quite successfully on FreeBSD 5.3. But I keep
reading about how many new features have been incorporated in 2.4.2. The
latest version for ports is stil 2.2.2. Any ideas on when the newer
version might be built and put in ports? (I'm not a geek, so installing
things
It seems that your xdvi is setup to use fairly low resolution fonts,
(406 dpi). Either you could use 'texconfig mode' to change the setup
to ljfour or some other 600dpi mode. If you want the agfafzz mode
for your printer but still want higher resolution in xdvi, change
manually in the file .../texm
I have tetex 2.01.
This sort of strangness makes me suspicious. Only I would never
know unless you told me.
I deinstalled tetex, recompiled and installed it.
I ran texconfig with better, but still awful results afterward.
My dvi file would come up but the notes looked like stems with
2 smal
Eric Gebhart wrote:
Here's more debug. It still doesn't make any sense. There is a missing }
- Mats Bengtsson's Original Message -
As I said before, please, please keep the discussion on the mailing
list, don't just reply to me in private.
Sure. If you'll do the same. It would be
I changed the lilypond-profile and now it seems to be getting further.
I changed This:
TEXMF="{$datadir,"`kpsexpand \\$TEXMF`"}"
To this:
TEXMF="{" "$datadir,"`kpsexpand \\$TEXMF`"}"
The extra { is now gone.
Now it can't find mf.base. It looks like it knows where it is,
but
Here's more debug. It still doesn't make any sense. There is a missing }
- Mats Bengtsson's Original Message -
> As I said before, please, please keep the discussion on the mailing
> list, don't just reply to me in private.
Sure. If you'll do the same. It would be a lot easier to ke
I'm running FreeBSD 4.8.
I had 1.6.12 almost working. It rendered music
but couldn't handle beams, or much of anything less
than a quarter note. stems and lines were missing or
short as well.
I thought I'd try 1.8. After a lot of hacking I finally
got it to compile and install.
lilypond run
18 matches
Mail list logo
