Am 04.10.2014 um 14:33 schrieb Son_V:
Hi all, as I have said i use Musescore to write down the notes and lyrics,
then I export to .xml to import the file in Frescobaldi. I encounter a
humble problem. If the score I'm transcribing has just one note in the first
beat, to have a correct visual
Thanks Simon (for your patience, in the first place). Well, it's an
anacrusis, I forgot to say it. And MS can handle a correct numbering. What
I'm not able to do is to make LilyPond to understand that the fist beat, the
anacrusis, should be numbered as beat 1. If I use \clef treble \key es
\major
When you say beat numbering do you mean bar numbering?
Richard
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 06:20 -0700, Son_V wrote:
Thanks Simon (for your patience, in the first place). Well, it's an
anacrusis, I forgot to say it. And MS can handle a correct numbering. What
I'm not able to do is to make LilyPond
As Richard noticed, I suppose you're talking about bar numbering.
Try :
\version 2.18
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
\set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 1/4)
% mes.0
c4
\unset Timing.measureLength
% mes. 1-5
\repeat unfold 5 c1
\break
% mes. 6-10
% measure number shows
Yes ... bar numbering. I used it in the subject of the post, but misspelled
it here.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167133.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry, I wasn't unable to make your examples to work. :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167134.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2014-10-04 15:59 GMT+02:00 Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com:
Sorry, I wasn't unable to make your examples to work. :-(
Which version are you using ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
2.18.2, the stable one.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167141.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing
2014-10-04 17:25 GMT+02:00 Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com:
2.18.2, the stable one.
So maybe a copy/paste error. Code works perfectly from my side. ;)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
But I've made no copy or paste. And this is just the first time I post the
question; I've had that problem any time I had an anacrusis. May I post my
file? I can't see how to solve this little but annoying problem.
--
View this message in context:
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 06:57 -0700, Son_V wrote:
Yes ... bar numbering. I used it in the subject of the post, but misspelled
it here.
In that case you can put
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
This is not the conventional numbering -
you can put
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
MANY THANKS. That solved.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/losing-a-bar-number-when-the-first-beat-is-irregular-tp167125p167146.html
Sent from the
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 08:55 -0700, Son_V wrote:
you can put
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #2
in the first full bar to cause this to be numbered as bar 2.
MANY THANKS. That solved.
I'm still baffled by your question - I notice that Musescore does not
generate this incorrect or
Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as correct,
as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
numbered, but the following one is labelled by the number 2. I thought
that this was correct. In Lilypond, the bar numbers are all a -1 in respect
to
Am 04.10.2014 20:40, schrieb Son_V:
Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as correct,
as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
numbered, but the following one is labelled by the number 2. I thought
that this was correct. In Lilypond, the
If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks. I've searched on beyond bars 2011 ed. but I wasn't able to
find a reference to this problem. Nor I was able to found a way in the
index: no irregular beats. Maybe it's hidden in another chapter.
But I
- Original Message -
From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: losing a bar number when the first beat is irregular
If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks.
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 20:54 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 04.10.2014 20:40, schrieb Son_V:
Sorry, I can't understand; with MuseScore I see the bar numbers as
correct,
as far I can understand. The first beat, that have just one note, is not
numbered, but the following one is labelled by the
Am 04.10.2014 um 21:22 schrieb Son_V:
If a piece starts with an incomplete measure this measure doesn't have a
number
Well, thanks. I've searched on beyond bars 2011 ed. but I wasn't able to
find a reference to this problem. Nor I was able to found a way in the
index: no irregular beats. Maybe
At 12:22 04/10/2014 -0700, Vincenzo Auer wrote:
I've searched on beyond bars 2011 ed. ...
That's *Behind* Bars, in fact: it's a pun on the expression meaning
in prison.
... but I wasn't able to find a reference to this problem.
Any excuse to consult the bible! Page 484, under Bar
20 matches
Mail list logo
