On Monday 17 March 2003 11:24 am, Hans Forbrich wrote:
> > > Sly gets the notes out of the .ly file. All you would have to do
> > > is copy the .sly score, delete lines 1-2 and 9-x, and run sly.
> > > If you want both the long and short, you would have a different
> > > name on the new includes. N
> > Sly gets the notes out of the .ly file. All you would have to do
> > is copy the .sly score, delete lines 1-2 and 9-x, and run sly.
> > If you want both the long and short, you would have a different name
> > on the new includes. Not a problem.
> > DaveA
I think I'll have to take another look
On Monday 17 March 2003 10:27 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2003 09:03 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 March 2003 11:30 pm, Hans Forbrich wrote:
> > > I agree to a certain extent. Judicious use of < music > and {
> > > music } and \break - along with a ver
On Monday 17 March 2003 09:03 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2003 11:30 pm, Hans Forbrich wrote:
> > I agree to a certain extent. Judicious use of < music > and {
> > music } and \break - along with a very strict naming rules (drawing
> > on years of large project s/w codin
On Saturday 15 March 2003 11:30 pm, Hans Forbrich wrote:
> I agree to a certain extent. Judicious use of < music > and { music
> } and \break - along with a very strict naming rules (drawing on
> years of large project s/w coding experience) - helped me recently
> (70+ page Cantata). You are howe
Hans Forbrich wrote:
I could also request the reverse - having an external file containing the
music assigned to an Identifier, I'd love to be able to 'extract bars 3-8'
into the current score.
I haven't tried, but it might be possible to use the skipTypesetting
property to achieve something like t
I agree to a certain extent. Judicious use of < music > and { music } and
\break - along with a very strict naming rules (drawing on years of large
project s/w coding experience) - helped me recently (70+ page Cantata).
You are however quite correct - the source score blocks are very, very
ugly.
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:49:28 -0700
Hans Forbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason for needing separate 'score' starts. It seems you want to
> use the'sequential' capability, something like
The scale example was the simplest to explain, but I agree that it
doesn't really need seperate score
Any reason for needing separate 'score' starts. It seems you want to use the
'sequential' capability, something like
\score {
\transpose c'{ \scale }
\transpose g' { \scale }
\transpose d'{ \scale }
}
This would run the c' scale, followed immediately by then the g', etc. Or,
by putt
scales.ly:
scale= \notes{ blah blah}
\score{ \transpose c'{ \scale }}
\score{ \transpose g'{ \scale }}
\score{ \transpose d'{ \scale }}
\score{ \transpose a'{ \scale }}
-
book1.tex:
\documentclass[]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1cm,nohead,nofoot]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\lilypondfile[26pt]{b
10 matches
Mail list logo
