On Oct 22, 2010, at 9:11 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
My concern is that LSR search does not, at the moment, find the snippets
that go with these two erroneous headers, Adding a laissezVibrer tie to
only one note of a chord and Schleifer articulation mark
Sorry, I'm confused. I tried
Original Message -
From: Sebastiano Vigna vi...@dsi.unimi.it
To: Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
On Oct 22, 2010, at 9:11 PM
- Original Message -
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:20:21 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2010, um 14:05:16 schrieb Phil Holmes:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:20:21 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
At the moment, a search in the LSR that should find 719 and/or 713
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=Choir+piano+template
brings up links to these
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk; Keith E OHara
k-ohara5...@oco.net; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:20:21 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Now approved. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=719 . This will
mean deleting snippet 713, since I've renamed this. I always like
to check before doing
Hello
On 21/10/2010 21:26, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:20:21 -0700, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Now approved. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=719 . This will
mean deleting snippet 713, since
Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
Phil
I'm happy to replace this template in the LM now
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Now approved. http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=719 . This will
mean deleting snippet 713, since I've renamed this. I always like
to check before doing that - anyone any problems with that deletion?
If the new one has exactly
2010/10/19 Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
The defaults are :
Staves within a group are spaced 9 staff-lines apart (from centerline to
centerline).
After the last staff in a group, the next staff is placed 10.5 staff-lines
below (centerline-to-centerline).
After a staff that is not in a
Hello
On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote:
2010/10/19 Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net
The defaults are :
...
However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal
taste about readability) there should be more space after
...
While all
2010/10/19 James james.l...@datacore.com
On 19/10/2010 10:01, Jan Warchoł wrote:
However, in my opinion (and i'm an amateur, judging only by my personal
taste about readability) there should be more space after (...)
While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:55 -0700, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not forget
after all this is a *template*.
Yep. If any clear need comes to light from this discussion of the new spacing,
let's make it an enhancement
, 2010 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:00:55 -0700,
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
While all these suggestions are perfectly reasonable, let's not
forget
after all this is a *template*.
Yep. If any clear need comes to light from
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:18:52 +0100
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Shouldn't the music for the Horn in F be printed in D major?
It is very common for key signatures to be omitted for Horn. As the
notes themselves are correct transpositions, it looks ok.
There is also a discrepancy
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:18:52 +0100 Trevor Daniels wrote:
Shouldn't the music for the Horn in F be printed in D major?
I will add a comment % Key signature is often omitted for horns.
As a user, I can easily insert it if I want it. The previous version omitted
this key sig (showing off a
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:50 -0400
From: David Santamauro david.santama...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net, lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID: 20101018062550.370d4
Hi Tim,
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:09:37 -0700
Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com wrote:
There is also a discrepancy between the transposition direction
(down 5th or up 4th). Some scores actually place an ambitus-sort-of
note at the beginning of the horn staff to indicate the
Am Sonntag, 17. Oktober 2010, um 09:41:38 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Keith E OHara wrote Saturday, October 16, 2010 10:27 PM
Having heard no complaints, a snippet with these changes is in the
LSR awaiting approval.
Keith, until it's approved, only the LSR admin and you as author
can see
- Original Message -
From: Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:57 AM
Subject: orchestral template, please comment
Dear orchestral writers,
I don't use LilyPond for orchestral scores very often, which means that
I need
Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2010, um 04:37:04 schrieb Brett McCoy:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
I just tried one of the examples on that site and, sadly,
Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2010, um 03:54:23 schrieb Mark Polesky:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
That version is way outdated. The latest version (for lilypond 2.13.x) is
available only in git and is up-to-date as of yesterday's git
Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2010, um 05:14:54 schrieb Keith E OHara:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:54:23 -0700, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
The documentation, yes, but I have not used the package.
I was a bit curious to compare
Dear orchestral writers,
I don't use LilyPond for orchestral scores very often, which means that I
need to refer to the template in Appendix 5.1 of the Learning Manual.
There is one bug with the template, and five other changes that I suggest to
help it meet the goals set in its
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
- Mark
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
I just tried one of the examples on that site and, sadly, the
orchestrallily.ly file fails to parse under Lilypond 2.12.3, tons
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:54:23 -0700, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
The documentation, yes, but I have not used the package.
I was a bit curious to compare the plain .ly score that Reinhold's package
would create to the template
Brett McCoy wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
I just tried one of the examples on that site and, sadly,
the orchestrallily.ly file fails to parse under Lilypond
2.12.3, tons of syntax errors. I guess the author hasn't
kept up
On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Brett McCoy wrote:
Have you looked at Reinhold's OrchestralLily package?
http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/
I just tried one of the examples on that site and, sadly,
the orchestrallily.ly file fails to parse under
29 matches
Mail list logo
