>> Thanks for your try. Alas, the notation you are suggesting is not
>> standard in piano notation – the first quarter needs a separate
>> stem.
>
> Back to the music at hand, I would propose challenging the notion
> that "the first quarter needs a separate stem". How absolute is
> this rule in
On 2018-08-19 10:04, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
The main difference is that the quarter note does not get its own
column.
Thanks for your try. Alas, the notation you are suggesting is not
standard in piano notation – the first quarter needs a separate stem.
As one infrequently bound to theory
>> It essentially boils down to the fact that inter-voice ties (and
>> slurs) would be tremendously helpful for notation of piano music.
>>
>> Does anyone know what obstacles prevent an implementation of such a
>> feature?
>
> Any reason you don't move the Tie/Slur engraver to Staff level if
>
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> It essentially boils down to the fact that inter-voice ties (and
> slurs) would be tremendously helpful for notation of piano music.
>
> Does anyone know what obstacles prevent an implementation of such a
> feature?
Any reason you don't move the Tie/Slur engraver to
>> \relative c' {
>> \clef "bass"
>> \time 3/4
>> << { 2. ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes 2 r4 \unHideNotes } \\
>>{ d!2. ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff 2. } \\
>>{ f4 e2 ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes 2 s4 \unHideNotes } >>
>> }
>
On 2018-08-19 02:18, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
please have a look at the attached left hand piano staff image. I
need the following, very ugly code to write it with lilypond.
\relative c' {
\clef "bass"
\time 3/4
<< { 2. ~ |
\oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes 2 r4 \unHideNotes }
Folks,
please have a look at the attached left hand piano staff image. I
need the following, very ugly code to write it with lilypond.
\relative c' {
\clef "bass"
\time 3/4
<< { 2. ~ |
\oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes 2 r4 \unHideNotes } \\
{ d!2. ~ |
