On Saturday, May 28, 2016, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't
> see any difference.
> g.
In this case, nothing noticeable, but it really is different because using
\\ creates completely new voice. So,
What's the difference using or not using the \\? I tried but I didn't
see any difference.
g.
On 27 May 2016 at 22:52, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote:
> In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer:
>
> <<
> \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
In the line of using a master to hold all dynamic information, I’d prefer:
<<
\repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
\\
{ s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
>>
JM
> Le 27 mai 2016 à 22:11, Gianmaria Lari a écrit :
>
>>> Is there any way to write the previous code using
>> Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
>> like this (that of course does not work):
>>
>> \p \< \repeat unfold 3 {a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5} \!
>>
>
> <<
> \repeat unfold 3 { a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 }
> { s1\p\< | s1 | s2. s4\! }
> >>
Oh! You're right, it
Am 27.05.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Toine Schreurs:
Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
the same notes but different dynamic information:
\version "2.19.40"
{
a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
}
Is there any way to
> Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
> the same notes but different dynamic information:
>
> \version "2.19.40"
> {
> a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
> a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
> a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
> }
>
> Is there any way to write the previous code using a
Have a look to the following code. Please note that each line contain
the same notes but different dynamic information:
\version "2.19.40"
{
a'-4 \p \< g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5
a'-4 g'-3 e'-2 c''-5 \!
}
Is there any way to write the previous code using a repeat? Something
like