Aloha.
It was a version mismatch. Thank you for your help.
J.
On 4/20/22 16:45, Ralph Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:22 PM John Helly wrote:
Aloha.
I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred
Mahalo.
It was version mismatch. Thanks for your response.
J.
On 4/20/22 16:54, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:21 PM John Helly wrote:
Aloha.
I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred
Good point. I am duly reprimanded.
J.
On 4/21/22 01:01, David Kastrup wrote:
John Helly writes:
Aloha.
I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not
seem to work in that it produces:
Starting lilypond
On 21/04/2022 12:01, David Kastrup wrote:
John Helly writes:
Aloha.
I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not
seem to work in that it produces:
Starting lilypond 2.20.0 [test2.ly]...
Try matching
John Helly writes:
> Aloha.
>
> I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
> struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not
> seem to work in that it produces:
>
> Starting lilypond 2.20.0 [test2.ly]...
Try matching the version of the documentation
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:21 PM John Helly wrote:
> Aloha.
>
> I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been struggling
> with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not seem to work in
> that it produces:
>
> Starting lilypond 2.20.0 [test2.ly]...
>
> Processing
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:22 PM John Helly wrote:
> Aloha.
>
> I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been struggling
> with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not seem to work in
> that it produces:
>
> Starting lilypond 2.20.0 [test2.ly]...
>
> Processing
>
Aloha.
I've not used LP for a while but in coming back to it I've been
struggling with repeats and find that this 'preferred syntax' does not
seem to work in that it produces:
Starting lilypond 2.20.0 [test2.ly]...
Processing
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
bla = { big series of notes \tag #'here {} another series of notes }
\pushToTag #'here { some notes1 } \bla
\pushToTag #'here { some notes2 } \bla
Yes, this would be a way. Just like:
before = { big series of notes }
after = { another series of notes }
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
bla = { big series of notes \tag #'here {} another series of notes }
\pushToTag #'here { some notes1 } \bla
\pushToTag #'here { some notes2 } \bla
Yes, this would be a way. Just like:
before = { big series of
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
bla = { big series of notes \tag #'here {} another series of notes }
\pushToTag #'here { some notes1 } \bla
\pushToTag #'here { some notes2 } \bla
Yes, this would be a way.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl wrote:
However, I'd like to avoid the use of variables since that visually
interrupts the flow of notes.
I don't think there's any way to avoid interrupting the flow. However
you can avoid variables and keep the music inline
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
bla = { big series of notes \tag #'here {} another series of notes }
\pushToTag #'here { some notes1 } \bla
\pushToTag #'here { some notes2
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If you don't want the flow of notes interrupted, what will mark the
location where some notes1 and some notes2 are to be spliced in?
That's why I used \repeat to illustrate:
\repeat unfold 2 {
big series of notes
\alternative { { some notes 1 } {
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
$(pattern (A B C D) (A B D A C D))
{ a' a' a' a' }
{ b' b' b' b' }
{ c'' c'' c'' c'' }
{ d'' d'' d'' d'' }
Nifty!!
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
If you don't want the flow of notes interrupted, what will mark the
location where some notes1 and some notes2 are to be spliced in?
That's why I used \repeat to illustrate:
\repeat unfold 2 {
big series
Hi,
Sometimes I feel the need to make life easier in situations like this:
big series of notes some notes1 another series of notes
big series of notes some notes2 another series of notes
Something similar to:
\repeat unfold 2 {
big series of notes
\alternative { { some notes 1 }
Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl writes:
Hi,
Sometimes I feel the need to make life easier in situations like this:
big series of notes some notes1 another series of notes
big series of notes some notes2 another series of notes
Something similar to:
\repeat unfold 2 {
big
Mailinglist
Subject: Re: repeats and alternatives
Neil Puttock wrote:
In your first example, LilyPond sees three blocks of music
inside \alternative since there's an isolated barcheck
between the two music parts.
This is a very easy mistake to make (and an annoying one to
have to figure out on your own
Mark
On 04/12/2010 23:03, Mark Polesky wrote:
Neil Puttock wrote:
In your first example, LilyPond sees three blocks of music
inside \alternative since there's an isolated barcheck
between the two music parts.
This is a very easy mistake to make (and an annoying one to
have to figure out
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse, more
alternatives than repeats but the second example compiles just fine?
\version 2.12.3
\book {
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
\repeat volta 2
On 4 December 2010 22:05, James Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse, more
alternatives than repeats but the second example compiles just fine
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 4 December 2010 22:05, James Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm doing
wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with the excuse,
more alternatives
Am 04.12.2010 um 23:05 schrieb James Bailey:
I don't understand alternatives. Can someone explain to me what I'm
doing wrong. Why does the first example not compile properly with
the excuse, more alternatives than repeats but the second example
compiles just fine?
Hi James,
in your first
Neil Puttock wrote:
In your first example, LilyPond sees three blocks of music
inside \alternative since there's an isolated barcheck
between the two music parts.
This is a very easy mistake to make (and an annoying one to
have to figure out on your own). Can someone mention this
in the docs?
Felix Krause wrote:
Hi all,
I have two problems with endings of volta repeats:
1) I have a volta repeat with an alternative ending, like this:
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
\repeat volta 2 { r4 f r f }
\alternative { { r f r f } { r f r a, } }
d a d a
The
In message 4a68a0ff.7040...@ultrasw.com, Paul Scott
psl...@ultrasw.com writes
Is there a setting or something to do this automatically? Why isn't
it done by default anyway? (btw: the override command is just used to
demonstrate the problem, I only need the measure numbers at the
beginning of
Hi all,
I have two problems with endings of volta repeats:
1) I have a volta repeat with an alternative ending, like this:
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
\repeat volta 2 { r4 f r f }
\alternative { { r f r f } { r f r a, } }
d a d a
The two endings should have
Felix Krause wrote:
Hi all,
I have two problems with endings of volta repeats:
1) I have a volta repeat with an alternative ending, like this:
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#t #t #t)
\repeat volta 2 { r4 f r f }
\alternative { { r f r f } { r f r a, } }
d a d a
The two
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Yota,
On 9/6/07, *yota moteuchi* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here, magically, the second alternative bar vanished... why ?!
You can't put overrides (or anything else) between the bracketed
sections of \alternative; just put the bar
Dear Mailing list
I have a bunch of questions about the repeat syntax I'll like to submit to
you.
\version 2.11.28
1) About numbering
here is a ordinar situation of repeat volta with an alternative :
\repeat volta 2 {
a b c b
}
\alternative {
{ e f e f }
{ e f e b}
}
c a e f
\break
Hi Yota,
On 9/6/07, yota moteuchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here, magically, the second alternative bar vanished... why ?!
You can't put overrides (or anything else) between the bracketed sections of
\alternative; just put the bar number override inside the second
alternative.
The problem
32 matches
Mail list logo
