On 20/03/2014 10:30, Urs Liska wrote:
I think that LilyPond's main strength is transformative use: different
page formats, different media, different transpositions, individual
variations.
Yes, and I have/had the impression that it _is_ possible now to
promote this feature. Of course I don't e
Another interesting option might be the new library from Frescobaldi. Peter is
using it for the export side of things, and it might be useful for import too.
IIUC Frescobaldi can write a .ly file from its internal DOM representation. I
think there is much in common between translating that DOM _
Francisco Vila writes:
> This is true but he is talking about using "their MusicXML importer" I
> think.
>
> Without knowing all the internal details, I can say this sounds easy
> but it is Not. Because, it imports, and converts to what exactly?
> Certainly not to a LilyPond-usable representation
Price could be an argument to introduce in GNU and free world. This
was mis case.
After deceptions with a disapeared GUI (HB-Engraver) and even worse
with the hotline of Finale, I switched to MusixTeX, but this was also
annoying... At this point, I knew only that paper is the better way.
If lilypon
Am 20.03.2014 10:25, schrieb David Kastrup:
Francois Planiol writes:
Lily is free and that is a bg problem, for salesmen.
Remember the incandescent lamp? It was not expensive enough and
forcedly replaced by a dangerous CFL with a higher margin for
everybody except the end-customer. So for
Francois Planiol writes:
> Lily is free and that is a bg problem, for salesmen.
>
> Remember the incandescent lamp? It was not expensive enough and
> forcedly replaced by a dangerous CFL with a higher margin for
> everybody except the end-customer. So forget it, when it is free. Just
> even w
2014-03-20 10:01 GMT+01:00 pls :
>
> On 20.03.2014, at 08:35, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> Musescore is open source software, why not [try to] use their importer?
> MuseScore will drop their support for LilyPond in version 2.0 (see
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-02/msg00087.htm
On 20.03.2014, at 08:35, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> I use musescore for MusicXML -> LilyPond conversion. It does a much
> better job than any other tool I know (including musicxml2ly).
Hm, my experience has been quite different! 7 months ago I tested MuseScore
v1.3 with 10 MusicXML-files of ope
Am 20.03.2014 08:35, schrieb Johan Vromans:
SoundsFromSound writes:
Urs Liska wrote
Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
1. Flawless MusicXML import and export.
#1 is the next largest hurdle.
Yes, and a crucial one. But I think current development is very
promising. For the firs
Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> In my opinion, here — in order of importance — are the things we need to make
> established houses sit up and take notice:
>
> 1. Flawless MusicXML import and export.
> 2. Better “pixel-level” control of objects.
> 3. A finely-tuned stylesheet syst
Hi Johan and all,
this reminds me of an idea I had quite some time ago:
A program like MuseScore might import lilypond either by a stream,
created by lilypond, or via module calls made by a scheme-module which
makes use of the musescores API.
Now this is just an idea for the archives (who knows,
SoundsFromSound writes:
> Urs Liska wrote
>> Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
>>> 1. Flawless MusicXML import and export.
>>>
>>> #1 is the next largest hurdle.
>>
>> Yes, and a crucial one. But I think current development is very
>> promising. For the first time someone is actual
Am 20.03.2014 01:56, schrieb SoundsFromSound:
Are there any style sheets floating around that people can take a look at?
The sheet Urs & co. used looked great to my eyes, on that collection.
Which ones are you referring to?
Maybe that could help users and also inspire them to create their ow
;m
>> looking forward to that (there are two publishers I'll visit for closer
>> demonstrations, with two more I have hopes to get to that point too).
>>
>> Urs
>>
>>>
>>> Kieren.
>>> __________
/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Are there any style sheets floating around that people can take a look at?
The sheet Urs &am
Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Urs,
Time for a Lilypond Publishing House...
I'd say rather push LilyPond into the existing publishing houses.
Why not both?
Nothing against it. But actually there _are_ already a number of
"LilyPond Publishing Houses" - all of them of neg
Hi Urs,
>> Time for a Lilypond Publishing House...
> I'd say rather push LilyPond into the existing publishing houses.
Why not both?
> And I think changes have never been better for that than now.
True.
In my opinion, here — in order of importance — are the things we need to make
established
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2014-03-19 13:27 GMT+01:00 Klaus Föhl :
>
>> Did not spot a stand for Sibelius. I looked but did not hunt for it.
>
> Last time I had news of, it was defunct. Sure, they still could be
> trying to sell it, but IMHO only a fool would buy a copy.
I thought Avid was putting
2014-03-19 13:27 GMT+01:00 Klaus Föhl :
> Did not spot a stand for Sibelius. I looked but did not hunt for it.
Last time I had news of, it was defunct. Sure, they still could be
trying to sell it, but IMHO only a fool would buy a copy.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.cs
Am 19.03.2014 13:27, schrieb Klaus Föhl:
Hello,
This year a short visit to the Musikmesse only.
Learning about the "BEST EDITION 2014" award only after the event
(and would have had to miss that one anyway).
Congratulations nevertheless to Urs and Janek and all else involved.
Thanks.
Missin
Am 19.03.2014 14:15, schrieb Francois Planiol:
Time for a Lilypond Publishing House...
Francois
I'd say rather push LilyPond into the existing publishing houses. And I
think changes have never been better for that than now.
Although this probably wouldn't be cherished by everyone here ...
-
Time for a Lilypond Publishing House...
Francois
2014-03-19 7:27 GMT-05:00, Klaus Föhl :
> Hello,
>
> This year a short visit to the Musikmesse only.
> Learning about the "BEST EDITION 2014" award only after the event
> (and would have had to miss that one anyway).
> Congratulations nevertheless t
Hello,
This year a short visit to the Musikmesse only.
Learning about the "BEST EDITION 2014" award only after the event
(and would have had to miss that one anyway).
Congratulations nevertheless to Urs and Janek and all else involved.
Missing out on the MusicXML meeting as well,
but I noted it w
23 matches
Mail list logo
