... and this close the thread :) It couldn't be more clear David and it makes
perfectly sense.
Thanks a lot!!!
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p177007.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
:)
…and to be consistent, you’d also have to change the way a tilde is used to
signify a tie, which current connects the note it follows to the note it
precedes.
Michael
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p176957.html
Sent from
Gianmaria Lari gianmarial...@gmail.com writes:
Yes! Thank you Peter (and Urs), I think now it's clear
Lilypond use a postfix syntax. To apply a function 'f' to the note 'a' the
lilypond syntax is a \f and not viceversa. Because the open parenthese is
like a function (a function that
the other function: after the note.
Of course, everything is possible, and we could make the lilypond parser
more complex and use the other notation for the slur issue. But this has
been considered not important :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax
is not explicitly mentioned in that article is that in all other
cases markers are also appended to the notes, e.g. dynamics,
articulations, markups etc.
HTH
Urs
Thank you, Gianmaria
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928.html
Sent from the User
in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
understand the
consequences of this. Wouldn't be possible to slur the four notes a b c d
using the other syntax
(a b c d)
instead of
a (b c d)
?
Thank you, g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p176942.html
Sent from the User
On 2015-05-23 18:56, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
In Frescobaldi if you use Quick Insert to slur the four notes you'll get:
|a( b c d)|
I tend to think the syntax |a ( b c d )| is preferable, but maybe with
this syntax it is clearer that the '(' belongs to the 'a' and not to
the 'b' - and ')'
On 2015-05-23 18:29, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I understood that slur markers are not brackets in the mathematical
sense but simply mark something to start or end but don't understand the
consequences of this. Wouldn't be possible to slur the four notes a b c d
using the other syntax
(a b c
