Re: tag issue

2019-04-15 Thread Gianmaria Lari
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 13:06, Thomas Morley wrote: > Am Sa., 13. Apr. 2019 um 12:20 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari > : > > > > Harm, if I understood corretly the code: > > > > \version "2.18.2" > > \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) > > > > music = { > > \tag #'testOne a > > \tag #'testTwo b > > } >

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Sa., 13. Apr. 2019 um 12:20 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari : > > Harm, if I understood corretly the code: > > \version "2.18.2" > \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) > > music = { > \tag #'testOne a > \tag #'testTwo b > } > \keepWithTag #'testOne {\music~\music} > > > is converted to: > >

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread mskala
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Gianmaria Lari wrote: >   \tag #'testOne a  >   \tag #'testTwo b > ~ >   \tag #'testOne a  >   \tag #'testTwo b > > } > > > But then why lilypond removes the tie? Shouldn't just remove the expression > following testTwo that is "b" ? The tie is not a separate

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Gianmaria Lari
Harm, if I understood corretly the code: \version "2.18.2" \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) music = { \tag #'testOne a \tag #'testTwo b } \keepWithTag #'testOne {\music~\music} is converted to: \keepWithTag #'testOne { \tag #'testOne a \tag #'testTwo b ~ \tag #'testOne a \tag

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Gianmaria Lari
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 11:41, Thomas Morley wrote: > Am Sa., 13. Apr. 2019 um 11:16 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari > : > > > > I don't understand the following behaviour: > > > > \version "2.18.2" > > \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) > > > > music = { > > \tag #'testOne b > > \tag #'testTwo b^"M "

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Sa., 13. Apr. 2019 um 11:16 Uhr schrieb Gianmaria Lari : > > I don't understand the following behaviour: > > \version "2.18.2" > \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) > > music = { > \tag #'testOne b > \tag #'testTwo b^"M " > } > > \keepWithTag #'testOne {\music~\music} > \keepWithTag #'testTwo

Re: tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Gianmaria Lari
Sorry, a slightly more clear example: \version "2.18.2" \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) music = { \tag #'testOne a \tag #'testTwo b } \keepWithTag #'testOne {\music~\music} \keepWithTag #'testTwo {\music~\music} I would expect a~a and b~b but I obtain a a and b~b g.

tag issue

2019-04-13 Thread Gianmaria Lari
I don't understand the following behaviour: \version "2.18.2" \tagGroup #'(testOne testTwo) music = { \tag #'testOne b \tag #'testTwo b^"M " } \keepWithTag #'testOne {\music~\music} \keepWithTag #'testTwo {\music~\music} I would expect this would generate two pretty similar scores: the

Re: [PATCH] deian package creation + git tag issue

2008-07-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Sébastien Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way the git repository tags release/2.11.53-1 and release/2.11.53-2 are both the same and there are not presents in the master branch. Thus git-describe would find release/2.11.52-1 as most recent version. As

[PATCH] deian package creation + git tag issue

2008-07-25 Thread Sébastien Gross
Hi, Here you can find a patch to create the /debian directory in order to create packages. I tested (generated packages) on a lenny amd64 host. It should work for other debian-based distros too (surch as ubuntu). I separated every packages by its function. Maybe there is a smarter way to build