Simon Albrecht writes:
> Thanks, David and Jean, for your replies. I have no intention to
> reopen a can of worms here, and I didn’t remember that discussion
> (IIRC, that was at a time when I more regularly kept up with all
> LilyPond issues).
>
> Using \keepWithTag a \keepWithTag b \music is ve
Thanks, David and Jean, for your replies. I have no intention to reopen
a can of worms here, and I didn’t remember that discussion (IIRC, that
was at a time when I more regularly kept up with all LilyPond issues).
Using \keepWithTag a \keepWithTag b \music is very reasonable,
especially consid
David Kastrup writes:
> Simon Albrecht writes:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and
>> tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should
>> look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they
>> don’t:
>>
>>
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and
> tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should
> look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they
> don’t:
>
>
> \version "2.23.5"
>
Le 28/01/2022 à 13:45, Simon Albrecht a écrit :
Dear list,
I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and tagGroups.
In the following example, I thought the two staffs should look the
same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they don’t:
\version
Dear list,
I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and tagGroups. In
the following example, I thought the two staffs should look the same,
even without the \removeWithTag command, but they don’t:
\version "2.23.5"
% tested with 2.23.5 (guile2-build) and
