Just as Graham, I cannot repeat your problem. I tried both version 2.7.6
and 2.6.3. As always, I recommend the stable version 2.6.x for any
serious typesetting, unless you need one of the new features in 2.7.x.
/Mats
Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
I'm having a problem that I can't
Alas that did not solve the problem in 2.7.4 but it did solve it for
2.6.x so at least I've got a good copy now.
Thanks all.
Jay
BTW there does seem to be disagreement on the list, I am under the
impression that Han-Wen thinks 2.7x are usable and therefore should be
used (and sometimes have
Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
Alas that did not solve the problem in 2.7.4 but it did solve it for
2.6.x so at least I've got a good copy now.
Thanks all.
Jay
BTW there does seem to be disagreement on the list, I am under the
impression that Han-Wen thinks 2.7x are usable and
On Monday 22 August 2005 21.24, Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
Alas that did not solve the problem in 2.7.4 but it did solve it for
2.6.x so at least I've got a good copy now.
Thanks all.
Jay
BTW there does seem to be disagreement on the list, I am under the
impression that Han-Wen
On 22-Aug-05, at 3:06 PM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 21.24, Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
But then Mats/Graham and others keep on recommending staying with
'stable' which won't have the 'needed' features. I'd love a
clarification on this one.
It depends on what
I'm having a problem that I can't see to fix.
Here's the file.
The problem is pdf output at measure 36 third staff. The triplet or
something has made the staff spacing huge. Since it's the only place
that this is happening and there is nothing that I can see in the file
that makes it this
Graham (all)
I edited it down to 6 measures and the 'problem' didn't appear and it
doesn't happen with any other triplets in the piece (and there are many).
So- next step?
Jay
Graham Percival wrote:
On 21-Aug-05, at 10:57 AM, Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote:
The problem is pdf
I hate to make a simple-minded suggestion, but the triplet in question
\times 2/3{a c e}
is written differently from all your other triplets. If you put a space
after the 2/3 and an 8 after the a, does the problem persist?
\times 2/3 {a8 c e}
Conceivably, the \times operator blows
