Hello,
I have a score with multiple staves. One instrument enter into unmetered
timing and performs a cadenza, the other five instruments rest. The problem
is that when the file is compiled, the barlines in the output is completely
thrown off, even when the same measure is put into a Cadenza on
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 02:11:32AM -0400, Joshua Armenta wrote:
Hello,
I have a score with multiple staves. One instrument enter into unmetered
timing and performs a cadenza, the other five instruments rest. The problem
is that when the file is compiled, the barlines in the output is
On 19 September 2010 08:11, Joshua Armenta josharme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a score with multiple staves. One instrument enter into unmetered
timing and performs a cadenza, the other five instruments rest. The problem
is that when the file is compiled, the barlines in the output is
Hello,
I've included a minimal example below; why doesn't it work and how do I
correct it?
(It works fine without the alto and tenor parts.)
Many thanks yet again,
Gerard
\version 2.12.2
\score {
\new PianoStaff {
\new Staff {
\new Voice=soprano { \voiceOne
I am having a problem with bar lines, if I put the following around a staff
break
\bar ||
\break
\bar |:
I get the repeat sign on the start of the staff, but not the double bar on the
end of the previous staff.
I am using partial bars before and after the break, but through
On 2010-09-19 15:38, Alex Jones wrote:
I am having a problem with bar lines, if I put the following around a staff
break
\bar ||
\break
\bar |:
I get the repeat sign on the start of the staff, but not the double bar on the
end of the previous staff. [...]
Anyone have any ideas what I'm doing
Check your inbox for the answer to this question you were sent yesterday.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Gerard McConnell
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 12:41 PM
Subject: piano staves and lyrics
Hello,
I've included a minimal
Graham Percival gpermus at gmail.com
We *have* a set of best practices. They're LM 5
Working on
LilyPond projects. I wrote them two years ago, and
AFAIK nobody
has ever read them.
Where exactly are they, please?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
- Original Message -
From: aliteralmind aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: best practices
Graham Percival gpermus at gmail.com
We *have* a set of best practices. They're LM 5
Working on
LilyPond projects.
Thanks a lot!!!
-akj
On Sep 19, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2010-09-19 15:38, Alex Jones wrote:
I am having a problem with bar lines, if I put the following around a staff
break
\bar ||
\break
\bar |:
I get the repeat sign on the start of the staff, but not the
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Where exactly are they, please?
Um. Learning Manual 5. Entitled Working on LilyPond
projects.
I read the learning manual. I didn't find the words best
practices in it, and thought there was something else I
was missing.
I don't appreciate the
On Sep 19, 2010, at 6:09 PM, aliteralmind wrote:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Where exactly are they, please?
Um. Learning Manual 5. Entitled Working on LilyPond
projects.
I read the learning manual. I didn't find the words best
practices in it, and thought there was
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, aliteralmind
aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Where exactly are they, please?
Um. Learning Manual 5. Entitled Working on LilyPond
projects.
I read the learning manual. I didn't find the words best
Ok. I give I give.
I have been studying the documentation intensely and
thought there was something I missed. I already read it.
It was a genuine question and I was surprised by the
response.
Devs don't want to be pin pricked, and newbies don't
want to be fearful.
I appreciate and am amazed
- Original Message -
From: aliteralmind aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: best practices
Ok. I give I give.
I have been studying the documentation intensely and
thought there was something I missed. I
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 19, 2010 5:22 PM
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, aliteralmind
aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
Where exactly are they, please?
Um. Learning Manual 5. Entitled Working on LilyPond
projects.
I read
- Original Message -
From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca; aliteralmind
aliteralmind-lilyp...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: best practices
Graham Percival wrote Sunday,
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
And anyway, I only said Um
It was an angry Um! :)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I'm generally normally quite helpful (or try to be). It was just that
Graham had given you all the information you needed - you just needed
to read it and spend a little while wondering what LM could stand for.
It is agreed-upon best practice _not_ to
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:36:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I'm generally normally quite helpful (or try to be). It was just that
Graham had given you all the information you needed - you just needed
to read it and spend a little while wondering
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, David Kastrup wrote:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
Graham had given you all the information you needed - you just needed
to read it and spend a little while wondering what LM could stand for.
It is agreed-upon best practice _not_ to use those abbreviations
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: best practices
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
I'm generally normally quite helpful (or try to be). It was just that
Graham had given you
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, David Kastrup wrote:
It is agreed-upon best practice _not_ to use those abbreviations on the
general user list.
I agree, but: Since many people use these abbreviations, Would it be
an an idea to
Sorry about that, brief problem with my email that resulted in
double-posting.
Excellent answer sorted my question out immediately, thanks again.
Gerard
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Check your inbox for the answer to this question you were sent
Hi all,
I have several files with definitions of guitar fret diagrams for
various chord shapes (e.g. c-shape.ly, a-shape.ly, g-shape.ly, e-
shape.ly and d-shape.ly). I can't include all of these files at the
same time in the main file as quite a few chord alternatives start on
the same
On 9/19/10 3:46 PM, Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
I have several files with definitions of guitar fret diagrams for
various chord shapes (e.g. c-shape.ly, a-shape.ly, g-shape.ly, e-
shape.ly and d-shape.ly). I can't include all of these files at the
same time in the
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:07:28PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
I agree, but: Since many people use these abbreviations, Would it be
an an idea to mention those abreviations on manuals.html and in the
titles at the top of the manuals.
27 matches
Mail list logo
