I've done quite a bit of looking at this, and think it's to do with the use of
\grace at the start of the music. Here's an illustrative smaller version that
displays the same problem:
\version 2.16.2
harprh = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\grace { s16 } R1*4 |
\break
R1*4
}
Thank you for your kind reply. So it may be a bug, since it's impossible to
omit the empty grace for the correct alignment of music. Also, if you use
2.17.19 to compile, the application will abort suddenly. But when I comment out
the music as instrument groups (ww+br, or Perc+Str), no error
BUMP!
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Stjepan Horvat zvanste...@gmail.com wrote:
is there a way to fix indent in vim..i tryed gg=G but it looks mesed up..
i like frescobaldis way of fixing it..is there a problem in my setup
or something else..?!
example:
it tries to indent comments and
Greetings List,
If I have modern straight flags turned on and attempt to use cross-staff
stemmed chords, the flags show up on the bottom stems. What am I doing
wrong? Using ordinary default flags, the problem is not visible.
\version 2.17.18
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
Yes - it looks like a bug to me. I also have LilyPond crashing, but have only
tried the windows version so far. What operating system are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-user
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013
I think it's a bug in the way the modern-straight-flag stencil is implemented -
it seems to prevent any Flag.style being interpreted, and so the style of
no-flag is ignored. It's a bit of a faff, but you can fix this with selected
reverts and overrides in the voices:
\version 2.17.18
upper =
on 2013-05-31 at 16:51 Phil Holmes wrote:
It's a bit of a faff, but you can fix this with selected reverts and
overrides in the voices:
... is your code actually working for you? i tried it here and the
output is not right...
i had this very same problem recently, and i solved it by
Hi all,
When the final bar of a score contains a single note in one staff (or
voice) and the other a full bar rest, is there an easy way to
automatically center them both and obtain something more pleasant than
what is produced by default?
Thanks for any pointer or advice for building a
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:22:40 +0200
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr wrote:
When the final bar of a score contains a single note in one staff (or
voice) and the other a full bar rest, is there an easy way to
automatically center them both and obtain something more pleasant
than what is
2013/5/31 Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr
Hi all,
When the final bar of a score contains a single note in one staff (or
voice) and the other a full bar rest, is there an easy way to
automatically center them both and obtain something more pleasant than
what is produced by default?
The easy way is to use a regular whole note rest instead of a
whole-measure rest, i.e., r1 instead of R1. However, I recognize there are
times you either don't want to consider when another staff might only have
a single note (such as in orchestral scores) or when you need it to be a
whole-measure
2013/5/31 Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr:
Hi all,
When the final bar of a score contains a single note in one staff (or
voice) and the other a full bar rest, is there an easy way to
automatically center them both and obtain something more pleasant than what
is produced by default?
Le 31/05/2013 22:02, Thomas Morley disait :
2013/5/31 Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr:
Hi all,
When the final bar of a score contains a single note in one staff (or
voice) and the other a full bar rest, is there an easy way to
automatically center them both and obtain something more
Windows XP SP3. Please report this bug, because I don't subscribe to that list.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2013/5/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
this cannot wait any longer: there has to be a LilyPond blog.
Unless someone has a better idea, i'm going to create a blog on
WordPress.com tomorrow morning.
and it's time for a first contest! The blog needs a catchy name.
Whoever suggests
LilyFrog ?
2013/5/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
2013/5/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
this cannot wait any longer: there has to be a LilyPond blog.
Unless someone has a better idea, i'm going to create a blog on
WordPress.com tomorrow morning.
and it's time
On Fri, 31 May 2013 23:59:12 +0200
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
this cannot wait any longer: there has to be a LilyPond blog.
Unless someone has a better idea, i'm going to create a blog on
WordPress.com tomorrow morning.
I tried it under linux (ubuntu) with 2.16.2 and 2.17.19.
Your smaller snippet compiles without errors in both versions, but the
InstrumentName does not appear, as you described it.
Your whole score throws a lot of errors and warnings, shows the same
lack of the InstrumentName, but it also compiles
Hello everyone,
I am working on adjusting the vertical position of rests on a custom staff and
have run into a problem. I basically want the rests to be positioned as they
are on the standard staff, but in my custom staff there is no center line so
the rests become oriented to the next line
2013/6/1 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com
Hello everyone,
I am working on adjusting the vertical position of rests on a custom staff
and have run into a problem. I basically want the rests to be positioned
as they are on the standard staff, but in my custom staff there is no
center line so
lilyfee
(according to the film Princess Lillifee and the Little Unicorn)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilyblog?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Yes, this makes strange output - half right.
Andrew
On 1/06/13 1:51 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
I think it's a bug in the way the modern-straight-flag stencil is
implemented - it seems to prevent any Flag.style being interpreted,
and so the style of no-flag is ignored. It's a bit of a faff, but
This workaround works fine.
Do we need to raise a bug? The behaviour is clearly a defect.
Andrew
On 1/06/13 2:44 AM, luis jure wrote:
i had this very same problem recently, and i solved it by drastic
means: \autoBeamOff \override Flag.stencil = ##f \crossStaff { }
\autoBeamOn \revert
Across The Pond
From Across The Pond
Across the LilyPond
From Across The (Lily)Pond
etc
...just brainstorming.
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-blog-who-wants-to-join-tp146533p146543.html
Sent from the
LilyGilder[ok, nevermind]
SoundsFromSound wrote:
Across The Pond
From Across The Pond
Across the LilyPond
From Across The (Lily)Pond
etc
...just brainstorming.
-
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context:
pondscum?
[only joking...]
Andrew
On 1 June 2013 10:57, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
LilyGilder[ok, nevermind]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2013/5/31 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
Yes - it looks like a bug to me. I also have LilyPond crashing, but have
only tried the windows version so far. What operating system are you using?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
To: Phil Holmes
Cc:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:13:03AM +0200, Nils Gey wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 23:59:12 +0200
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
and it's time for a first contest! The blog needs a catchy name.
Whoever suggests the best name will be the first one interviewed on
the new
Thanks. *Very* kludgy.
No, not at all. The RemoveEmptyStaves feature was intended to be
adjusted in that way, so the solution in that snippet is a safe and
direct way to avoid removing staves when you don't want them
removed. It will not break at the next LilyPond version or
interfere
The Lilyponderer
-
Von meinem Fliewatüüt gesendet.
On 31 May 2013, at 23:59, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
this cannot wait any longer: there has to be a LilyPond blog.
Unless someone has a better idea, i'm going to create a
Am 01.06.2013 06:17, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
What prevents Lilypond to do this automatically? I want an option
that staves are only removed if there are at least two systems on a
page.
I would phrase that there *would* be two systems after removing the
empty staves.
Helge
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:17:02 -0700, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Thanks. *Very* kludgy.
No, not at all.
But it is a *manual* solution,
Yep, but (after looking up 'kludgy' I see that) manual and kludgy are different
things.
What prevents Lilypond to do this automatically? I want
33 matches
Mail list logo
